Skip to content

Issues: UbiquityRobotics/ESA_Microtractotruck

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8 Open 0 Closed
8 Open 0 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

AI 0.4. (Ubiquity Robotics, PM) A comprehensive analysis of the competitors to Ubiquity Robotics service will need to be provided, including a comparison of their features and characteristics against those of Ubiquity Robotics service. This will help strengthen the definition of the unique selling point (USP). PM/KO
#8 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
1
I.3 The pains and gains provided would need further development. Please, specify the solutions that the involved customers in delivery and landscaping have at the moment to justify that the service will reduce the operating cost per hour by 90%. PM/KO
#7 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
1
II.6 Profit of 8% has been included, profit is not permitted and should be removed in the updated PSS forms. [Full Proposal Ref.: G.4 Statement of Profit] Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#6 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
1
Please, adapt the study duration and milestone meetings to the FS management requirements (WPD, Gantt chart, F.3. planning). Please, consider also aligning the cycles and clarify the duration of the project (9 or 12 months), considering the cycles for the service implementation (M6 to M12). [Full Proposal Ref.: F.2.2 Work Package Descriptions (WPDs)] Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#5 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
1
Please, clarify who will be the Project Manager of the FS. [Full Proposal Ref.: E.4 & App. 2 (CVs): Experience/ competence of Key Personnel] Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#4 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
1
I.2 The Letters of Intent provided lack signatures. Please update and resubmit them with the appropriate signatures and dates. [Full Proposal Ref.: C.2 Customer Segments [including Letters of Interest]] Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#3 opened Sep 17, 2024 by davecrawley
2
The bidder is requested to provide the appropriate evidence of co-funding ability for the revised quantity (see A.1 Mayor Clarification Point) (e.g. bank statement) [Full Proposal Ref.: G.3.2 Source of Company Contribution] Critical Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#2 opened Sep 16, 2024 by davecrawley
1
The LoA is based upon a cost of €620,232.78 and a price of (up to) €487,000. The bidder is therefore requested to increase their company contribution in order to reduce the ESA price to the amount stated in the LoA of €487,000. Please, take into consideration the profit of 8% that should be removed from the cost. Critical Responded This is for issues to which UR has send ESA a response - but is still not concluded
#1 opened Sep 16, 2024 by davecrawley
1
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.