Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated details to run the program #12121

Closed

Conversation

Vaibhav-Sawate
Copy link

Describe your change:

#12120

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Add or change doctests? -- Note: Please avoid changing both code and tests in a single pull request.
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes Updated details to run the program #12120".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 16, 2024
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added require descriptive names This PR needs descriptive function and/or variable names require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required labels Oct 16, 2024
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

BASE58_ALPHABET = "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz"


def base58_encode(data: bytes) -> str:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file ciphers/base58.py, please provide doctest for the function base58_encode

return "1" * n + encoded


def base58_decode(s: str) -> bytes:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file ciphers/base58.py, please provide doctest for the function base58_decode

Please provide descriptive name for the parameter: s

Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

BASE58_ALPHABET = "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz"


def base58_encode(data: bytes) -> str:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file ciphers/base58.py, please provide doctest for the function base58_encode

return "1" * n + encoded


def base58_decode(s: str) -> bytes:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As there is no test file in this pull request nor any test function or class in the file ciphers/base58.py, please provide doctest for the function base58_decode

Please provide descriptive name for the parameter: s

@Vaibhav-Sawate Vaibhav-Sawate closed this by deleting the head repository Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed enhancement This PR modified some existing files require descriptive names This PR needs descriptive function and/or variable names require tests Tests [doctest/unittest/pytest] are required
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant