Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade tslib from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 #460

Merged

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jan 7, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade tslib from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago, on 2022-10-31.
Release notes
Package name: tslib from tslib GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: tslib

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@rmathew1011 rmathew1011 changed the base branch from master to tamu-lib-staging September 22, 2023 15:08
@rmathew1011 rmathew1011 merged commit 84b99ed into tamu-lib-staging Sep 22, 2023
@rmathew1011 rmathew1011 mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2023
@wwelling wwelling deleted the snyk-upgrade-3928f5d50f4647e3e7a5c5efec86433d branch September 13, 2024 18:27
@wwelling wwelling restored the snyk-upgrade-3928f5d50f4647e3e7a5c5efec86433d branch September 13, 2024 18:27
@wwelling wwelling deleted the snyk-upgrade-3928f5d50f4647e3e7a5c5efec86433d branch September 13, 2024 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants