Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rename [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelmenet.md to [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelem… #1

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Rename [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelmenet.md to [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelem… #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6e97e97
Rename [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelmenet.md to [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelem…
vmcj May 12, 2021
07edab1
Rename [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelement.md to [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regleme…
vmcj May 12, 2021
6150e56
Typo in Artikel 52 fixed
Siarl Jun 11, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion [NL] Huishoudelijk_Regelmenet.md → [NL] Huishoudelijk_Reglement.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -298,4 +298,4 @@ Voor niet begrote uitgaven die tijdens een bestuursperiode samen meer dan het mi

### Artikel 52

De Nederlandse versie van dit huishoudelijk regelement is leidend.
De Nederlandse versie van dit huishoudelijk reglement is leidend.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mvr320 is changing this allowed you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thats something for the ALV to decide, I think in general the VC will accept spelling changes, whereas grammar could change the intended meaning so might be a bit wrong?

Another system which I would prefer is to do the following:
If one wants to change a HR rule (which could be a motion) (s)he creates a PR on GitHub before the GA so there is a good wording (well thought of) and people can already form an opinion. After the GA the board will merge this change if/when its accepted at the GA (maybe with a link to the minutes with the discussion on this new or altered rule). With these rules you could decide to wait till the next GA (Which is fine by me.. you could also close this if you want)
This would help you to have a DB of motions (which is a task for the board and is always forgotten) and things would endup in the HR (which I think is a better location compared to having a long lists of motions which you only understand when you read about the discussion)

But... I'll not be at GAs so I leave this up to the current board to decide how they want to handle this. So feel free to just close it if you don't have an opinion yet.