Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BugFix] Fix refresh mv with some external table bug #55372

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[BugFix] Fix refresh mv with some external table bug #55372

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+16 −0

Conversation

LiShuMing
Copy link
Contributor

@LiShuMing LiShuMing commented Jan 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Why I'm doing:

Backport from #55363

What I'm doing:

Fixes #55366

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.4
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0

@LiShuMing LiShuMing requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 08:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 3.4 label Jan 23, 2025
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

❌ fail : 1 / 3 (33.33%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/connector/partitiontraits/JDBCPartitionTraits.java 1 3 33.33% [79, 82]

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@starrocks-cr starrocks-cr[bot] starrocks-cr[bot] left review comments

@stephen-shelby stephen-shelby stephen-shelby approved these changes

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@LiShuMing LiShuMing

Labels
3.4
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refresh materialized view failed: corrupted partition meta
2 participants
@LiShuMing @stephen-shelby