Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FILE_CONENT property proposal. #1737

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

FILE_CONENT property proposal. #1737

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

ml86
Copy link
Contributor

@ml86 ml86 commented Oct 17, 2023

No description provided.

@ml86 ml86 requested a review from fabsx00 October 17, 2023 10:01
Copy link
Contributor

@fabsx00 fabsx00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we just call them CONTENT, OFFSET, ...?

@ml86
Copy link
Contributor Author

ml86 commented Oct 17, 2023

We already have a CONTENT property which is used for CONFIG_FILE nodes. I did not want to reuse it to avoid confusion. As for the offsets: Yes, i can just name them OFFSET end OFFSET_END.

Renamed FILE_CONTENT_OFFSET to OFFSET and FILE_CONTENT_OFFSET_END to
OFFSET_END.
@ml86
Copy link
Contributor Author

ml86 commented Oct 17, 2023

Ok, i now reuse the already existing CONTENT property.

@ml86 ml86 merged commit a594fd6 into master Oct 18, 2023
2 checks passed
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the markus/fileContent branch October 18, 2023 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants