Skip to content

social: migrate from x to bluesky #6237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bjlittle
Copy link
Member

@bjlittle bjlittle commented Nov 24, 2024

🚀 Pull Request

Description

This pull-request migrates our social from X to Bluesky 🥳

Time to join the tech X-odus ... but don't take my word for it, checkout the stats here and here.

TODO:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.80%. Comparing base (a1c791e) to head (e558d56).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6237   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.80%   89.80%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       23752    23752           
  Branches     4418     4418           
=======================================
  Hits        21331    21331           
  Misses       1672     1672           
  Partials      749      749           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bjlittle bjlittle added this to the Candidate for next release milestone Jan 29, 2025
@pp-mo pp-mo requested review from trexfeathers and removed request for trexfeathers February 7, 2025 14:26
@trexfeathers trexfeathers self-assigned this Apr 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@trexfeathers trexfeathers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @bjlittle, sorry for forgetting about this.

I can confirm that there are no remaining references to Twitter in the repository (besides the linkcheck ignore), and that all your changes render as expected.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also announce this in a What's New entry?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Create SciTools/bluesky-scitools GH repository

Can I suggest just renaming the existing repository? It has good content in there and none of it is Twitter-specific.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🆕 Candidate to 👀 In Review in 🦔 v3.12.0 Apr 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see SciTools/.github#88

scitools-ci[bot]
scitools-ci bot previously requested changes Apr 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see SciTools/.github#89

@trexfeathers trexfeathers dismissed scitools-ci[bot]’s stale review April 10, 2025 13:50

See my comments on those linked issues.

@bjlittle bjlittle removed this from 🦔 v3.12.0 Apr 15, 2025
@bjlittle bjlittle moved this to 👀 In Review in 🦋 Iris 3.13.0 Apr 15, 2025
@bjlittle bjlittle self-assigned this Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Status: 👀 In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants