Skip to content

[Docs] Unify Fast behavior across chat providers - #1811

Draft
roomote-roomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/shared-fast-provider-guidance-3vi1yw19v68v5
Draft

[Docs] Unify Fast behavior across chat providers#1811
roomote-roomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/shared-fast-provider-guidance-3vi1yw19v68v5

Conversation

@roomote-roomote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

​Opened on behalf of @mrubens. Follow up by mentioning @roomote-roomote, in the web UI, or in Slack.

What changed

  • centralizes shared Fast context, delegation, web-link, and provider-conversation continuation behavior in the Sessions guide
  • replaces the obsolete automation continuation matrix with one accurate contract for Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, and Telegram
  • removes repeated shared capabilities and automation delivery prose from provider setup pages while retaining provider-specific commands, entry rules, attachments, setup, and UI limitations
  • removes the stale Telegram web-only continuation caveat from the custom automation editor and covers the shared copy with a Telegram render test
  • corrects Discord setup verification and automation report wording so neither assumes every Fast request immediately creates a task or thread

Why this change was made

Fast initiation and continuation now have provider parity, but documentation and automation settings still described the rollout's earlier provider differences. Keeping shared behavior in one place makes the current model easier to understand and prevents provider pages from drifting apart again.

Impact

Users now see one concise Fast behavior contract across supported communications providers, while real differences such as Slack !fast, Discord and Telegram /new, mention/thread/topic rules, Teams text-only request_user_input, attachment capabilities, and provider setup remain documented where they apply.

Mintlify validation and broken-link checks pass, the automation settings render suite passes all 50 tests, full lint and web typecheck pass, and the repository pre-push suite passes. Source searches found no remaining obsolete continuation wording outside historical release notes. Product-settings browser proof was blocked by the local setup guard, but the exact Telegram copy is covered by the render suite.

Screenshots

The Sessions guide states shared Fast context, delegation, web links, and provider-conversation continuation without provider-specific parity caveats.

The Automations guide uses shared delivery, destination-conversation, and Session-or-task wording across providers.

Discord setup verification keeps provider-specific checks while confirming Fast and same-Session continuation.

@roomote-community

roomote-community Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1 issue outstanding. See task

  • apps/docs/automations.mdx:130 advertises Telegram topic destinations for Fast automations, but only Telegram chat targets are configurable and routed.

Reviewed 92f855a

Comment thread apps/docs/automations.mdx
Runs with no report destination remain stored Fast sessions and do not post to
chat.
Fast automation reports can be delivered to Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, or
Telegram channels, chats, topics, or owner direct messages. Each run keeps a

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Telegram custom automation destinations are only chat IDs: the editor accepts a "Telegram chat ID" and buildFastAutomationConversation creates the Telegram reply target without a threadId. Therefore a Fast automation cannot be configured to deliver to a Telegram topic, despite this sentence. Please remove topics here (or add topic selection/routing support) so the shared contract does not advertise an unavailable destination.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant