Skip to content

chore: bump version to 0.15.0#193

Merged
MantisClone merged 1 commit intomainfrom
01-14-chore_bump_version_to_0.15.0
Jan 15, 2026
Merged

chore: bump version to 0.15.0#193
MantisClone merged 1 commit intomainfrom
01-14-chore_bump_version_to_0.15.0

Conversation

@MantisClone
Copy link
Member

@MantisClone MantisClone commented Jan 15, 2026

Problem

Need to create a new release for production deployment.

Proposed Solution

Bump minor version from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0 to reflect new features since last release:

  • feat: request faucet tokens from app
  • fix: move platform fee fields to body level in batchPay endpoint
  • feat: add payout confirmation dialogue component that showcases fees
  • feat: add payout confirmation component to direct payout
  • feat: add payout confirmation component to batch payouts
  • feat: add fallback display if no amountInUSD and add protocol fee
  • chore: update CTA from book a demo to get in touch

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Version bump to 0.15.0.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes or functional updates.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Walkthrough

Version bump from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0 in package.json. No functional changes, script modifications, or control flow alterations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Update
package.json
Version number incremented from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title directly and accurately reflects the main change: updating the package version from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0, which is the sole functional change in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.



📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9c273e and bc637ba.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*: - Only comment on issues that would block merging — ignore minor or stylistic concerns.

  • Restrict feedback to errors, security risks, or functionality-breaking problems.
  • Do not post comments on code style, formatting, or non-critical improvements.
  • Keep reviews short: flag only issues that make the PR unsafe to merge.
  • Limit review comments to 3–5 items maximum, unless additional blockers exist.
  • Group similar issues into a single comment instead of posting multiple notes.
  • Skip repetition — if a pattern repeats, mention it once at a summary level only.
  • Do not add general suggestions; focus strictly on merge-blocking concerns.
  • If there are no critical problems, respond with minimal approval (e.g., 'Looks good'). Do not add additional review.
  • Avoid line-by-line commentary unless it highlights a critical bug or security hole.
  • Highlight only issues that could cause runtime errors, data loss, or severe maintainability issues.
  • Ignore minor optimization opportunities — focus solely on correctness and safety.
  • Provide a top-level summary of critical blockers rather than detailed per-line notes.
  • Comment only when the issue must be resolved before merge — otherwise, remain silent.
  • When in doubt, err on the side of fewer comments — brevity and blocking issues only.
  • Avoid posting any refactoring issues

Files:

  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build
  • GitHub Check: Lint

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@greptile-apps
Copy link

greptile-apps bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Greptile Summary

This PR bumps the package version from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0 in preparation for production deployment. The version change is properly synchronized across both package.json and package-lock.json.

  • Version incremented correctly following semantic versioning (minor bump for new features)
  • All features listed in PR description are verified in git history since 0.14.0
  • No dependency changes or other modifications included
  • Clean, single-purpose version bump commit

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk
  • Simple version bump with consistent changes across both package files, no code modifications, and verified feature list alignment with git history
  • No files require special attention

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
package.json Version bumped from 0.14.0 to 0.15.0 to reflect new features
package-lock.json Lock file updated to match package.json version 0.15.0

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant PJ as package.json
    participant PL as package-lock.json
    participant Repo as Repository
    
    Dev->>PJ: Update version 0.14.0 → 0.15.0
    Dev->>PL: Update version 0.14.0 → 0.15.0
    Dev->>Repo: Commit version bump
    Repo->>Repo: Ready for production deployment
Loading

@MantisClone MantisClone merged commit 141c7ac into main Jan 15, 2026
10 checks passed
@MantisClone MantisClone deleted the 01-14-chore_bump_version_to_0.15.0 branch January 15, 2026 03:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant