docs: Improve documentation

[validcube]

Guide to use the application will be seperate from this PR

Split

• docs(security): init #1612

Staled; also outdated

[Axelen123]

What is the status of this?

It might make sense to split out the README and contribution guidelines into a separate PR if the other documentation will take time to finish

[validcube]

Guide to use compose-dev + developer will be seperate from this PR.

This PR will only improve general documentation like README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md, but include changes like spellcheck in other areas.

[Axelen123]

This is still incomplete

[Axelen123]

Updating has been implemented. The file is out of date (It is also not showing up in the github review page for some reason!)

[Axelen123]

This sounds kinda weird. What does "portable" mean here and how is it beneficial?

[validcube]

This sounds kinda weird. What does "portable" mean here and how is it beneficial?

I have to generate 4 compelling points or reasons to use the ReVanced Manager 💀

Any suggestion would be great.

[oSumAtrIX]

I've seen some consistency errors with our other repositories while skimming through this PR. It would be a good idea first to restore this consistency and then apply the change consistently across all involved repositories. An example of an inconsistency is that other repositories have an "About" section, such as ReVanced CLI, or the merge difference in language and wording.

Apart from that, there are some unfinished sections that already have been commented on as well as the patching page, which features no more note blocks about warnings and pitfalls. It may be a good idea to incorporate them if applicable to restore completeness.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 suggestions.

Files not reviewed (5)

• docs/4_building.md: Evaluated as low risk
• docs/README.md: Evaluated as low risk
• docs/3_troubleshooting.md: Evaluated as low risk
• docs/2_1_patching.md: Evaluated as low risk
• docs/2_2_managing.md: Evaluated as low risk

Comments skipped due to low confidence (2)

docs/0_prerequisites.md:8

• The phrase 'System that support running at least' is grammatically incorrect. It should be 'Systems that support running at least'.

System that support running at least 'arm64-v8a', 'armeabi-v7a', 'x86_64', or 'x86' application

docs/1_installation.md:3

• The sentence should be corrected to: 'To use ReVanced on your Android device, ReVanced Manager has to be installed. Refer to the Prerequisites if you haven't already.'

To use ReVanced on your Android device, ReVanced Manager have to be install, refer to the [Prerequisites](0_prerequisites.md) if haven't already.

The phrase 'an certain requirements had to be met' is grammatically incorrect. It should be 'certain requirements have to be met.'

Suggested change

	To use ReVanced Manager, an certain requirements had to be met.
	To use ReVanced Manager, certain requirements have to be met.

The phrase 'These requirement(s) are not required to be met' is awkwardly phrased. It should be 'These requirements are optional.'

Suggested change

	> These requirement(s) are not required to be met.
	> These requirements are optional.