Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed Docker issue #148

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

deepcat1337
Copy link

Proposed changes

This pull request fixes issues in the Dockerfile where dependency resolution and installation were failing due to missing packages (numpy, Cython) and excessive dependency resolution depth (ResolutionTooDeep). These changes ensure a smoother build process by pre-installing required dependencies and leveraging pip's legacy resolver when necessary. 👀🔧

Types of changes

Put an x in the boxes that apply 😄🚀

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) 🐛
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ✨
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) 💥
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply) 📖

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md 📚
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works ✅✔️
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate) 📝

Further comments

This bugfix was chosen to address repeated build failures due to dependency installation issues in the Dockerfile. Pre-installing numpy and Cython ensures smoother builds, while the addition of the legacy resolver resolves excessive dependency resolution depth issues (ResolutionTooDeep). This approach minimizes disruption to the existing workflow and reduces complexity. Alternative solutions, such as splitting requirements into smaller chunks, were considered but deemed unnecessary at this time. 💡❓

References and related issues (e.g. #1234)

N/A 📌

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 30, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
short-gpt-dcs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 30, 2024 6:43am

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant