You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
e.g. for a 1000cpr encoder with 200 steps/rev and 64 microsteps we have 64 microsteps and 5 encoder ticks per full step then 12.8 microsteps per encoder tick.
We could possible handle a few ways:
Microsteps become divisible by 10 e.g. 60 microsteps
Use a lookup table for phasing increments e.g. {12, 13, 13, 13, 13} for the above example
Compressed version of the above, in words "13 microsteps per tick, but every 4 ticks it is 12".
None of these seem satisfactory, hence an issue to noodle and get some comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
e.g. for a 1000cpr encoder with 200 steps/rev and 64 microsteps we have 64 microsteps and 5 encoder ticks per full step then 12.8 microsteps per encoder tick.
We could possible handle a few ways:
None of these seem satisfactory, hence an issue to noodle and get some comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: