Skip to content

Conversation

@QuentinWach
Copy link
Owner

Summary

  • add a reusable apply_density_update helper with masked box blur support for topology optimisation updates
  • rewrite the 4_topo example to use the helper and report the magnitude of every design-density change
  • add unit tests that validate density updates occur inside the masked design region

Testing

  • PYTHONPATH=. pytest tests/test_topology_updates.py

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68dd6b6627d08326b90b34c6270f1b33

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Comment on lines 329 to 333
) = apply_density_update(
design_density,
normalized_gradient,
mask,
learning_rate=LR,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Negate gradient before density update

The new apply_density_update helper adds the update as density + learning_rate * gradient, i.e. it assumes the passed gradient already points in the descent direction. In the topology example the raw overlap gradient is passed directly, whereas the previous implementation negated it before applying the optimizer. Because the objective being printed is the negative transmission, this change flips the optimization into gradient ascent and will push the design densities the wrong way, preventing the loop from improving the device. Pass -normalized_gradient (or otherwise negate the gradient) when calling apply_density_update so the update reduces the objective instead of increasing it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@QuentinWach QuentinWach closed this Oct 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant