Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugs resolved and ready for production #41

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HamzaQasim7
Copy link

@HamzaQasim7 HamzaQasim7 commented Jul 17, 2024

Description

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

@HamzaQasim7
Copy link
Author

Resolved build issue, fix flavour errors and code error are resolved.

@HamzaQasim7 HamzaQasim7 reopened this Jul 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@CrazyMarvin CrazyMarvin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for your fix! 👍
I just have two questions.

@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ android {
}
development {
dimension "default"
applicationIdSuffix ".dev"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it necessary to remove the applicationIdSuffix?
The idea is that the different flavors production, development and staging can be installed simultaneously and removing the suffix seems to prevent that, doesn't it?

applicationId "rocks.poopjournal"
minSdkVersion flutter.minSdkVersion
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it necessary to hardcode the minSdkVersion and compileSdkVersion?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants