Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration with CLB emulator and bet-ref example #1655

Draft
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

euonymos
Copy link
Contributor

@euonymos euonymos commented Oct 31, 2024

This PR is done as the main part of Milestone 5 of the Catalyst project PSM(CLB).

List of features:

  • brings up CLB emulator
  • bump Ogmios
  • fix era summary parsing
  • bet-ref example
  • update docs on testnet testing

@errfrom I am not sure we have to merge this into CTL in the long-term perspective as we discussed we want to continue further splitting it up into smaller pieces. This way I think the whole testnet suite should be a separate package.

Regarding the original testnet tests - as CHANGELOG.md says some are red. They are out of the scope, but I would like to figure out what is wrong there if I have a couple of spare hours.

Pre-review checklist

  • All code has been formatted using our config (make format)
  • Any new API features or modification of existing behavior are covered with tests
  • The template (templates/ctl-scaffold) has been updated
  • The changelog has been updated under the ## Unreleased header, using the appropriate sub-headings (### Added, ### Changed, ### Removed, ### Fixed), and the links to the appropriate issues/PRs have been included

@euonymos euonymos changed the title Use CLB emulator CLB emulator integration; bet-ref example Nov 22, 2024
@euonymos euonymos changed the title CLB emulator integration; bet-ref example Integration with CLB emulator and bet-ref example Nov 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants