Added python docstring check script #2741
Conversation
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces various configuration updates, code style enhancements, and workflow modifications. New linting and docstring validation configurations have been added for tools such as flake8, pydocstyle, and Black. Several legacy scripts were removed and replaced with updated implementations in a reorganized directory structure. Additionally, GitHub Actions workflows have been refined, including the introduction of a new Python-Compliance job that sets up the environment, caches dependencies, and performs style checks. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant PC as Python-Compliance Job
Dev->>GH: Push/Pull Request
GH->>PC: Trigger Python-Compliance Job
PC->>PC: Setup Python 3.11 and Cache Pip Dependencies
PC->>PC: Install Requirements (black, flake8, pydocstyle, etc.)
PC->>PC: Run Code Style & Docstring Checks
PC->>GH: Report Compliance Results
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces new configurations and updates across multiple workflow and script files. A new flake8 configuration file is added with specific ignore codes and a max line length. Several GitHub Actions workflow files have been updated with new script paths, improved docstrings, and reorganized imports. Legacy scripts for translation comparison and ignore directive checking were removed while new scripts for docstring validation, ignore checking, and translation comparison were added. Additionally, new configuration settings for pydocstyle and Black were introduced, and the .gitignore file was updated for Python virtual environments. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CI as CI Server
participant Job as Python-Compliance Job
participant Repo as Repository
participant Tools as Quality Tools (Black, Flake8, pydocstyle, Docstring Checker)
CI->>Repo: Checkout code
Repo-->>Job: Provide codebase
Job->>Tools: Setup Python environment & cache dependencies
Tools->>Job: Run code quality checks
Job->>CI: Report compliance status
sequenceDiagram
participant File as Python File
participant Validator as Docstring Validator
participant Parser as Docstring Parser
File->>Validator: Read file content
Validator->>Parser: Extract and analyze docstring
Parser-->>Validator: Return any violations
Validator->>Console: Output violation report
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_ignore.py (3)
53-74: Optional consideration for enhanced file discovery.
The_filepaths_in_directoriesfunction works as intended. If performance or advanced patterns are needed in the future, consider usingglob.igloborpathlib.Path.rglobfor more flexible matching.
76-196: Logic is generally solid but seems heavily tied to hard-coded lint rule checks.
The_check_for_ignore_directivefunction properly identifies Dart files, excludes generated files, and scans for specific ignore directives. For long-term maintainability, consider externalizing the list of targeted lint rules into a config file or constant for easier updates.
200-260: Potential improvement regarding process output.
Inmain(), capturing and printing current branch details might be too verbose in some CI contexts. Consider reducing print statements or providing a debug flag to toggle them..github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py (4)
76-98: Test function skipping is handled properly.
Theignore_functionfunction helps filter out test-related methods. The docstring should more accurately describe the purpose (it doesn't actually extract a docstring).
209-238: Exception checks for decorators.
Hard-coded decorator exceptions may warrant future refactoring if new decorators require exceptions. Current approach is acceptable.
470-551: Argument validation approach is robust.
The function verifies presence of an “Args:” section, plus descriptions. This is thorough, but consider partial matches or ignoring certain built-ins if that’s ever necessary.
675-713: Directory scanning is standard.
Consider a future extension for ignoring or including file patterns. As it stands, it’s good for broad scanning..github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py (3)
16-18: Consider using a dataclass instead of namedtuple.While namedtuple works, a dataclass would provide better type hints and be more maintainable.
-FileTranslation = namedtuple( - "FileTranslation", ["file", "missing_translations"] -) +from dataclasses import dataclass + +@dataclass +class FileTranslation: + file: str + missing_translations: list[str]
73-113: Add type hints to improve code maintainability.The function would benefit from type hints for better code understanding and IDE support.
-def check_translations(directory): +def check_translations(directory: str) -> None:
136-137: Consider using pathlib for robust path handling.Using
pathlibinstead ofos.pathwould make the path handling more robust and platform-independent.-default=os.path.join(os.getcwd(), "lang"), +from pathlib import Path +default=str(Path.cwd() / "lang"),.github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py (2)
164-167: Use f-strings instead of string formatting.Replace the older
.format()method with more readable f-strings.- repo_merge = git.Repo.clone_from( - "https://github.com/{}.git".format(args.repository), - "{}/{}".format(args.directory, repository_directory), - ) + repo_merge = git.Repo.clone_from( + f"https://github.com/{args.repository}.git", + f"{args.directory}/{repository_directory}", + )
113-113: Useinoperator instead of.__contains__.The
.__contains__method is less Pythonic than using theinoperator.- if line.strip() and line.startswith("+") and line.__contains__("///"): + if line.strip() and line.startswith("+") and "///" in line: - if line.strip() and line.__contains__("///"): + if line.strip() and "///" in line:Also applies to: 131-131
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
286-289: Inconsistent setup-python Action Version
In the main workflow a later version (v5) of theactions/setup-pythonaction is used (see line 52), whereas in the newPython-Compliancejob the version isv4. For consistency and to benefit from any improvements in the later version, consider updating the setup action in the new job tov5.- uses: actions/setup-python@v4 + uses: actions/setup-python@v5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.flake8(1 hunks).github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py(7 hunks).github/workflows/archive/talawa_mobile_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py(7 hunks).github/workflows/check_ignore.py(0 hunks).github/workflows/compare_translations.py(0 hunks).github/workflows/pull-request.yml(5 hunks).github/workflows/push.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/requirements.txt(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/check_ignore.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/countline.py(1 hunks).gitignore(2 hunks).pydocstyle(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .github/workflows/compare_translations.py
- .github/workflows/check_ignore.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- pyproject.toml
- .pydocstyle
- .flake8
- .github/workflows/push.yml
- .github/workflows/scripts/countline.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
275-275: unexpected key "Python-Compliance" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"
(syntax-check)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py
53-54: Use a single if statement instead of nested if statements
(SIM102)
138-138: Loop control variable argument_function not used within loop body
(B007)
162-162: Loop control variable argument_docstring not used within loop body
(B007)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_ignore.py (3)
1-3: No issues found with the shebang and top-level docstring.
Everything looks consistent with standard Python scripting conventions.
4-8: Imports are fine.
All necessary modules are imported, and there are no apparent issues.
10-51: CLI argument parsing is implemented cleanly.
The_arg_parser_resolverfunction clearly declares CLI arguments and describes them well in the docstring. No issues found..github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py (12)
1-3: File-level docstring is concise and appropriate.
No problems noted.
4-10: Imports and namedtuple usage are suitable.
Dependency ondocstring_parseris clearly shown; no conflicts found.
11-11: Namedtuple declaration is straightforward.
Defining "Violation" helps standardize reporting.
14-74: Docstring validation logic is clear and cohesive.
No immediate issues with the approach. The function gracefully handles file read errors.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
53-54: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
100-185: Mismatch in loop variable usage.
Withinmatch_arguments_to_docstring, at lines 138–157, the loop variableargument_functionisn’t actually referenced when iterating overarguments_function; the check isif argument_docstring not in arguments_function:. This suggests the outer loop might be unnecessary or incorrectly structured.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
138-138: Loop control variable
argument_functionnot used within loop body(B007)
162-162: Loop control variable
argument_docstringnot used within loop body(B007)
187-207: Decorator logic is clear.
The function checks for a single-line decorator above the function. Looks good for basic usage.
240-284: Function name and argument parsing.
There's a practical approach to extracting arguments, though be mindful that advanced Python syntax (like*args,**kwargs, or type hints) won't parse cleanly here.
286-422: Docstring extraction is thorough.
The logic around identifying docstring delimiters and parsing them is quite detailed. Ensure that multi-line or triple-quoted strings with embedded quotes are tested thoroughly.
424-468: Docstring short description checks are helpful.
Ensuring there's a blank line after the short description encourages good formatting. No major issues.
553-656: Returns section checks.
Similar thoroughness for verifying the “Returns:” section. The code is quite explicit, which is good for clarity but may need updates when dealing with more varied return signatures.
658-673: Delimiter detection is minimal and efficient.
This function is straightforward and self-explanatory.
715-774: CLI usage for the docstring check.
The main function handles directory inputs well. The output about each violation is clear and user-friendly..github/workflows/archive/talawa_mobile_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py (5)
2-14: Introductory docstring is clear.
Describes the script’s purpose and outlines the lint compatibility approach.
19-24: Function docstring for escaping MDX characters is concise.
Logic to escape certain symbols is straightforward. No issues found.
46-56: Docstring clarifies intent to handle Dart code blocks.
Removes//prefixes. Good approach for readability in the final MDX.
66-77: File processing docstring is well-structured.
The function flows logically: read, transform, write. No errors identified.
92-105: CLI usage for adjusting Dart Markdown.
The docstring is consistent with standard Python argument parsing scripts. Implementation is straightforward..github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured module docstring.The module's purpose and functionality are clearly documented.
.gitignore (1)
145-151: LGTM! Comprehensive Python environment exclusions.The added patterns for Python virtual environments follow standard practices and will help keep the repository clean.
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
290-324: Python Code Style Checks Setup Looks Good
The steps for caching pip packages, installing dependencies using a virtual environment, and running Black, Flake8, pydocstyle, and the custom docstring compliance check are well organized and follow best practices. No changes required in this section.
| black | ||
| pydocstyle | ||
| flake8 | ||
| flake8-docstrings | ||
| docstring_parser |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin package versions for reproducible builds.
To ensure consistent behavior across different environments, consider pinning the versions of all packages.
-black
-pydocstyle
-flake8
-flake8-docstrings
-docstring_parser
+black==23.12.1
+pydocstyle==6.3.0
+flake8==7.0.0
+flake8-docstrings==1.7.0
+docstring_parser==0.15📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| black | |
| pydocstyle | |
| flake8 | |
| flake8-docstrings | |
| docstring_parser | |
| black==23.12.1 | |
| pydocstyle==6.3.0 | |
| flake8==7.0.0 | |
| flake8-docstrings==1.7.0 | |
| docstring_parser==0.15 |
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
Outdated
| @@ -272,3 +271,53 @@ jobs: | |||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | |||
| PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} | |||
| GITHUB_REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }} | |||
|
|
|||
| Python-Compliance: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Indentation Issue in the 'Python-Compliance' Job
The static analysis tool reports an unexpected key "Python-Compliance" because this job appears not to be indented properly under the jobs: block. All job definitions must be aligned (e.g. indented two spaces under jobs:) so they are parsed correctly.
-Python-Compliance:
+ Python-Compliance:📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Python-Compliance: | |
| Python-Compliance: |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
275-275: unexpected key "Python-Compliance" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"
(syntax-check)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
Outdated
| Python-Compliance: | ||
| name: Check Python Code Style | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| needs: [Code-Quality-Checks] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Invalid 'needs' Dependency Reference
The needs field for the Python-Compliance job is set to [Code-Quality-Checks], but no job with that identifier exists in this workflow. Please update this dependency to reference a valid, existing job (for example, if you intended it to run after "Validate-Coderabbit", use that) or remove the dependency if it is not required.
Diff suggestion if the dependency should be removed:
- needs: [Code-Quality-Checks]
+ # needs: [Code-Quality-Checks] # Removed because Code-Quality-Checks is not defined.Or, if "Validate-Coderabbit" is the intended dependency:
- needs: [Code-Quality-Checks]
+ needs: [Validate-Coderabbit]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| needs: [Code-Quality-Checks] | |
| needs: [Validate-Coderabbit] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
275-324: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueCritical YAML Formatting and Dependency Issue in Python-Compliance Job
The newPython-Compliancejob is intended to enforce Python code style checks. However, there are two concerns:
Indentation Issue:
The static analysis tool reports an unexpected key"Python-Compliance", which indicates that this job is not correctly indented under thejobs:section. All job definitions should be aligned consistently (e.g., indented two spaces underjobs:).Proposed Diff Fix:
Ensure that all subsequent lines (276–324) for this job are indented an additional two spaces so that they fall under the
jobs:mapping.Non-existent Dependency in needs:
ThePython-Compliancejob specifiesneeds: [Code-Quality-Checks], but no job with the IDCode-Quality-Checksis present in the workflow. Verify if this dependency should reference an existing job (e.g.,Flutter-Codebase-Check) or if the missing job needs to be defined.Action:
Please correct the dependency inneedsto reference an available job, or define theCode-Quality-Checksjob if that was the intent.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
275-275: unexpected key "Python-Compliance" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"
(syntax-check)
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
.github/workflows/archive/talawa_mobile_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py (4)
20-42: Add type hints for better code maintainability.The function logic is correct and well-documented. Consider adding type hints to improve code maintainability.
-def escape_mdx_characters(text): +def escape_mdx_characters(text: str) -> str:
45-64: Add type hints and improve regex patterns.The function logic is correct, but consider these improvements:
- Add type hints for better code maintainability
- Make regex patterns more specific to avoid potential false positives in code comments within code blocks
-def adjust_dart_code_blocks(text): +def adjust_dart_code_blocks(text: str) -> str: # Ensure the Dart code blocks use ```dart for proper syntax highlighting - text = re.sub(r"```(\s*)dart", r"```dart", text) + text = re.sub(r"^```(\s*)dart", r"```dart", text, flags=re.MULTILINE) # Handle single-line comments in Dart (`//` or `///`) - text = re.sub(r"(///|//)\s*", "", text) + text = re.sub(r"^(///|//)\s*", "", text, flags=re.MULTILINE)
66-89: Add type hints and error handling.The function could benefit from:
- Type hints for better code maintainability
- Error handling for file operations
-def process_file(filepath): +def process_file(filepath: str) -> None: """Process a single Dart Markdown file for MDX compatibility. Writes the processed content back to the file if any changes occur. Args: filepath (str): The path to the Markdown file to be processed. + + Raises: + FileNotFoundError: If the file does not exist. + PermissionError: If there are insufficient permissions to read/write the file. Returns: None """ - with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file: - content = file.read() + try: + with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file: + content = file.read() - # Escape MDX special characters - content = escape_mdx_characters(content) - # Adjust Dart code blocks for MDX - content = adjust_dart_code_blocks(content) + # Escape MDX special characters + content = escape_mdx_characters(content) + # Adjust Dart code blocks for MDX + content = adjust_dart_code_blocks(content) - # Write back to the file only if changes were made - with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as file: - file.write(content) + # Write back to the file only if changes were made + with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as file: + file.write(content) + except (FileNotFoundError, PermissionError) as e: + print(f"Error processing file {filepath}: {str(e)}") + raise
91-123: Add type hints and error handling for directory operations.The function could benefit from:
- Type hints for better code maintainability
- Error handling for directory operations
-def main(): +def main() -> None: """Process all Dart Markdown files in a specified directory. Scans for Markdown files and processes them for MDX compatibility, especially focusing on Dart-specific docs. Args: None + + Raises: + FileNotFoundError: If the specified directory does not exist. + PermissionError: If there are insufficient permissions to access the directory. Returns: None """ parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( description="Adjust Dart Markdown files for MDX compatibility." ) parser.add_argument( "--directory", type=str, required=True, help="Directory containing Markdown files to process.", ) args = parser.parse_args() - # Process each Markdown file in the directory - for root, _, files in os.walk(args.directory): - for file in files: - if file.lower().endswith(".md"): - process_file(os.path.join(root, file)) + try: + # Process each Markdown file in the directory + for root, _, files in os.walk(args.directory): + for file in files: + if file.lower().endswith(".md"): + process_file(os.path.join(root, file)) + except (FileNotFoundError, PermissionError) as e: + print(f"Error accessing directory {args.directory}: {str(e)}") + raise.github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py (2)
15-18: Consider adding type hints to the namedtuple fields.While the namedtuple definition is clear, adding type hints would improve type safety and IDE support.
-FileTranslation = namedtuple( - "FileTranslation", ["file", "missing_translations"] -) +FileTranslation = namedtuple( + "FileTranslation", ["file", "missing_translations"], + defaults=(None, None) +) +# Add type hints +from typing import NamedTuple + +class FileTranslation(NamedTuple): + file: str + missing_translations: list[str]
115-149: Consider adding logging instead of print statements.The script would benefit from proper logging configuration for better output control and debugging capabilities.
+import logging + +# Configure logging +logging.basicConfig( + level=logging.INFO, + format='%(levelname)s: %(message)s' +) def main(): """Parse command-line arguments... """ - print( + logging.error( f"Error: The specified directory '{args.directory}' does not exist." ).github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py (3)
113-132: Simplify string comparison logic.The string contains check can be simplified using the
inoperator directly.- if line.strip() and line.startswith("+") and line.__contains__("///"): + if line.strip() and line.startswith("+") and "///" in line:
131-132: Useinoperator for string containment check.Similar to the previous comment, replace
__contains__with theinoperator.- if line.strip() and line.__contains__("///"): + if line.strip() and "///" in line:
164-168: Consider using string formatting for better readability.The string concatenation can be improved using f-strings.
- "https://github.com/{}.git".format(args.repository), - "{}/{}".format(args.directory, repository_directory), + f"https://github.com/{args.repository}.git", + f"{args.directory}/{repository_directory}",.github/workflows/scripts/check_ignore.py (3)
109-114: Consider using any() for multiple conditions.The multiple conditions can be simplified using
any().- if ( - not filePath.startswith("lib") - or not filePath.endswith(".dart") - or not os.path.exists(filePath) - ): + if any([ + not filePath.startswith("lib"), + not filePath.endswith(".dart"), + not os.path.exists(filePath) + ]):
213-218: Add type hint for the return value.The function's return type should be explicitly defined.
-def decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(item): +def decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(item) -> bool:
223-255: Consider using regex compilation for better performance.The regex pattern should be compiled once for better performance when used multiple times.
+import re + +# Compile regex patterns once +PROPERTY_REGEX = re.compile(r"^@[a-zA-Z0-9_]*\.(?:setter|getter)$") + def decorator_in_docstring_exception_list(item): """Extract the arguments of a function read from a file... """ # Initialize key variable result = False exceptions = ["@property"] property_exceptions = ["setter", "getter"] # Return for exception in exceptions: if exception in item.strip(): result = True break for exception in property_exceptions: - regex = f"^@[a-zA-Z0-9_]*.{exception}$" - if re.match(regex, item): + if PROPERTY_REGEX.match(item): result = True break.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py (2)
52-56: Simplify nested if statements as suggested by static analysis.The nested if statements can be combined for better readability.
- if start > 0: - previous_line = lines[start - 1].strip() - if previous_line.startswith("@"): - result = previous_line + if start > 0 and lines[start - 1].strip().startswith("@"): + result = lines[start - 1].strip()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
53-54: Use a single
ifstatement instead of nestedifstatements(SIM102)
675-713: Consider adding progress indication for large directories.When processing large directories, it would be helpful to show progress to the user.
+from tqdm import tqdm def check_directory(directory, exclude_dirs=None): """Check all Python files in a directory for docstring compliance. ... """ # Initialize key variables all_violations = {} _exclude_dirs = exclude_dirs if bool(exclude_dirs) else [] + # Get total number of Python files + total_files = sum(1 for root, dirs, files in os.walk(directory) + for file in files if file.endswith('.py')) + # Recursive directory search for files for root, dirs, files in os.walk(directory): # Skip excluded directories dirs[:] = [ d for d in dirs if os.path.join(root, d) not in _exclude_dirs ] # Process files in each directory - for file in files: + for file in tqdm(files, total=total_files, desc="Checking files"):
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.flake8(1 hunks).github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py(7 hunks).github/workflows/archive/talawa_mobile_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py(7 hunks).github/workflows/check_ignore.py(0 hunks).github/workflows/compare_translations.py(0 hunks).github/workflows/pull-request.yml(5 hunks).github/workflows/push.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/requirements.txt(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/check_ignore.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py(1 hunks).github/workflows/scripts/countline.py(1 hunks).gitignore(2 hunks).pydocstyle(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .github/workflows/check_ignore.py
- .github/workflows/compare_translations.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- pyproject.toml
- .github/workflows/scripts/countline.py
- .pydocstyle
- .github/workflows/requirements.txt
- .flake8
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
275-275: unexpected key "Python-Compliance" for "workflow" section. expected one of "concurrency", "defaults", "env", "jobs", "name", "on", "permissions", "run-name"
(syntax-check)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
.github/workflows/scripts/check_docstrings.py
53-54: Use a single if statement instead of nested if statements
(SIM102)
138-138: Loop control variable argument_function not used within loop body
(B007)
162-162: Loop control variable argument_docstring not used within loop body
(B007)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/archive/talawa_mobile_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py (1)
2-14: LGTM! Well-structured module docstring.The module docstring clearly explains the script's purpose and compliance standards.
.github/workflows/scripts/compare_translations.py (2)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured imports and clear module docstring.The script has a clear purpose, well-organized imports (standard imports grouped together), and uses proper Python conventions.
21-57: LGTM! Well-documented function with comprehensive error handling.The
compare_translationsfunction is well-structured with:
- Clear docstring following Google style
- Proper error message formatting
- Comprehensive comparison logic
.gitignore (1)
145-151: Python Virtual Environment Ignorance Added
The new entries for virtual environment folders (e.g..env,.venv,env/, etc.) are correctly added to ensure that Python virtual environment files are not tracked by Git. This will help keep the repository clean and avoid potential conflicts..github/workflows/push.yml (1)
53-63: Updated Script Path for Ignore Directives Check
The commands to change permissions and execute thecheck_ignore.pyscript have been updated to reflect its new location under the./.github/workflows/scripts/directory. This adjustment looks correct; please verify that the new path is consistent with all related workflows..github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
52-56: Addition of Code Line Counting Step
A new step to count lines of code usingcountline.pyhas been added. The permission change (chmod +x) and subsequent execution are correctly implemented. Just ensure the script behaves as expected in various repository structures.
57-60: Updated Check for Ignore Directives in PR Workflow
The step that sets the executable permission forcheck_ignore.pyhas been updated here as well. Consistency with the PUSH workflow is maintained, which is good.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
60-60: "github.head_ref" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details
(expression)
73-74: Translation Files Comparison Step Updated
The changes to makecompare_translations.pyexecutable and run it with the proper directory argument are in order. This step reinforces the checking process for translation consistency.
| def check_translations(directory): | ||
| """Load default translation and compare with other translations. | ||
|
|
||
| Args: | ||
| directory (str): The directory containing translation files. | ||
|
|
||
| Returns: | ||
| None | ||
| """ | ||
| default_file = "en.json" | ||
| default_translation = load_translation( | ||
| os.path.join(directory, default_file) | ||
| ) | ||
| translations = os.listdir(directory) | ||
| translations.remove(default_file) # Exclude default translation | ||
|
|
||
| error_found = False | ||
|
|
||
| for translation_file in translations: | ||
| other_file = os.path.join(directory, translation_file) | ||
| other_translation = load_translation(other_file) | ||
|
|
||
| # Compare translations and get detailed error messages | ||
| errors = compare_translations( | ||
| default_translation, | ||
| other_translation, | ||
| default_file, | ||
| translation_file, | ||
| ) | ||
| if errors: | ||
| error_found = True | ||
| print(f"File {translation_file} has missing translations for:") | ||
| for error in errors: | ||
| print(f" - {error}") | ||
|
|
||
| if error_found: | ||
| sys.exit(1) # Exit with an error status code | ||
| else: | ||
| print("All translations are present") | ||
| sys.exit(0) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for file operations.
The check_translations function should handle potential file operation errors.
def check_translations(directory):
"""Load default translation and compare with other translations.
...
"""
default_file = "en.json"
- default_translation = load_translation(
- os.path.join(directory, default_file)
- )
+ try:
+ default_translation = load_translation(
+ os.path.join(directory, default_file)
+ )
+ except (FileNotFoundError, json.JSONDecodeError) as e:
+ print(f"Error loading default translation file: {e}")
+ sys.exit(1)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def check_translations(directory): | |
| """Load default translation and compare with other translations. | |
| Args: | |
| directory (str): The directory containing translation files. | |
| Returns: | |
| None | |
| """ | |
| default_file = "en.json" | |
| default_translation = load_translation( | |
| os.path.join(directory, default_file) | |
| ) | |
| translations = os.listdir(directory) | |
| translations.remove(default_file) # Exclude default translation | |
| error_found = False | |
| for translation_file in translations: | |
| other_file = os.path.join(directory, translation_file) | |
| other_translation = load_translation(other_file) | |
| # Compare translations and get detailed error messages | |
| errors = compare_translations( | |
| default_translation, | |
| other_translation, | |
| default_file, | |
| translation_file, | |
| ) | |
| if errors: | |
| error_found = True | |
| print(f"File {translation_file} has missing translations for:") | |
| for error in errors: | |
| print(f" - {error}") | |
| if error_found: | |
| sys.exit(1) # Exit with an error status code | |
| else: | |
| print("All translations are present") | |
| sys.exit(0) | |
| def check_translations(directory): | |
| """Load default translation and compare with other translations. | |
| Args: | |
| directory (str): The directory containing translation files. | |
| Returns: | |
| None | |
| """ | |
| default_file = "en.json" | |
| try: | |
| default_translation = load_translation( | |
| os.path.join(directory, default_file) | |
| ) | |
| except (FileNotFoundError, json.JSONDecodeError) as e: | |
| print(f"Error loading default translation file: {e}") | |
| sys.exit(1) | |
| translations = os.listdir(directory) | |
| translations.remove(default_file) # Exclude default translation | |
| error_found = False | |
| for translation_file in translations: | |
| other_file = os.path.join(directory, translation_file) | |
| other_translation = load_translation(other_file) | |
| # Compare translations and get detailed error messages | |
| errors = compare_translations( | |
| default_translation, | |
| other_translation, | |
| default_file, | |
| translation_file, | |
| ) | |
| if errors: | |
| error_found = True | |
| print(f"File {translation_file} has missing translations for:") | |
| for error in errors: | |
| print(f" - {error}") | |
| if error_found: | |
| sys.exit(1) # Exit with an error status code | |
| else: | |
| print("All translations are present") | |
| sys.exit(0) |
| for argument_function in arguments_function: | ||
| # Track whether the argument is defined | ||
| # in the docstring parameters | ||
| for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring: | ||
| if argument_docstring not in arguments_function: | ||
| violations.append( | ||
| Violation( | ||
| line=line_number + 1, | ||
| function=function.name, | ||
| issue=f"""\ | ||
| Argument '{argument_docstring}' defined in the docstring is not \ | ||
| an argument in the function""", | ||
| action=f"""\ | ||
| Remove argument '{argument_docstring}' from the docstring""", | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| bad_argument_function = True | ||
| break | ||
| if bad_argument_function: | ||
| break | ||
|
|
||
| # We found an error, no need to continue generating violations | ||
| if not bad_argument_function: | ||
| # Check whether docstring arguments match function arguments | ||
| for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring: | ||
| # Track whether the argument is defined | ||
| # in the function parameters | ||
| for argument_function in arguments_function: | ||
| if argument_function not in arguments_docstring: | ||
| violations.append( | ||
| Violation( | ||
| line=line_number + 1, | ||
| function=function.name, | ||
| issue=f"""\ | ||
| Argument '{argument_function}' defined in the function is not \ | ||
| an argument in the docstring""", | ||
| action=f"""\ | ||
| Add argument '{argument_function}' to the Docstring""", | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| bad_argument_docstring = True | ||
| break | ||
| if bad_argument_docstring: | ||
| break | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix unused loop variables flagged by static analysis.
The loop variables are not used in their respective loops, which could indicate a logic error.
- for argument_function in arguments_function:
- # Track whether the argument is defined
- # in the docstring parameters
- for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring:
+ for argument_docstring in arguments_docstring:
if argument_docstring not in arguments_function:
violations.append(
Violation(
line=line_number + 1,
function=function.name,
issue=f"""\
Argument '{argument_docstring}' defined in the docstring is not \
an argument in the function""",
action=f"""\
Remove argument '{argument_docstring}' from the docstring""",
)
)
- bad_argument_function = True
+ bad_argument_docstring = True
break
- if bad_argument_function:
+ if bad_argument_docstring:
breakCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
138-138: Loop control variable argument_function not used within loop body
(B007)
162-162: Loop control variable argument_docstring not used within loop body
(B007)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2741 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 96.96% 96.96%
=================================================
Files 189 189
Lines 10052 10052
=================================================
Hits 9747 9747
Misses 305 305 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py(7 hunks).github/workflows/pull-request.yml(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/archive/documentationcheck.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
286-286: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Checking codebase
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (14)
53-56: Docstring Enforcement: Count Lines Script Setup
The steps to set execute permissions oncountline.pyand then run it with specified exclusions look good. Please ensure that the script exists at the specified path and that the exclusion list accurately reflects the files you intend to omit during the line count.
57-58: File Permissions: Check Ignore Script
Setting execute permissions oncheck_ignore.pybefore execution is a proper practice. Confirm that the script functions as expected when run in the workflow environment.
69-70: Dependencies and Execution: Run check_ignore Script
The sequence of installing GitPython followed by executing thecheck_ignore.pyscript with repository and branch parameters is well arranged. Verify that the passed arguments correctly align with the script's requirements.
73-74: Translation Files Comparison Script
The added commands to set execute permissions and run thecompare_translations.pyscript are appropriate. Please double-check that the directory argument (lang) correctly points to your translations directory.
177-177: Job Dependency Update: Flutter-Testing
Updating the Flutter-Testing job to depend on bothFlutter-Codebase-CheckandPython-Complianceensures that compliance checks are enforced before testing. This change aligns with the broader refactoring goals.
250-250: Node Version Formatting
The change to specify the Node.js version as"20.x"using double quotes is a minor formatting improvement.
275-279: Addition of Python-Compliance Job
The introduction of thePython-Compliancejob, which executes Python code style, linting, and docstring checks, is a strong enhancement that meets the PR objectives. Ensure that downstream jobs correctly wait for its successful execution.
280-284: Python-Compliance: Checkout Step
The checkout step for thePython-Compliancejob is standard and properly configured, ensuring that the latest code is available for analysis.
289-297: Caching Pip Packages
The caching step for pip packages is well configured with an appropriate key strategy and restore keys, which should help reduce build times by reusing dependencies.
298-300: Installing Python Dependencies
Creating a virtual environment, activating it, upgrading pip, and installing the required packages from.github/workflows/requirements.txtis a robust setup for ensuring consistent Python tooling.
302-304: Black Formatter Check
Runningblack --check .within the activated virtual environment efficiently verifies code formatting against the project's standards.
306-309: Flake8 Linter Check
The flake8 command is configured with the Google docstring convention and ignores specific error codes. Please verify that targeting only the.githubandscriptsdirectories covers all relevant Python files for your compliance checks.
310-313: pydocstyle Check
Running pydocstyle with the Google convention and ignoring codes D415 and D205 appears appropriate. Confirm that these ignore options align with your intended docstring standards.
314-317: Docstring Compliance Check Script Execution
Executing the customcheck_docstrings.pyscript to validate docstring standards in the specified directories reinforces code quality. Make sure the script is maintained alongside your lint configurations as your codebase evolves.
| - name: Set up Python 3.11 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-python@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| python-version: 3.11 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Python Version Setup: Upgrade Action Version
The Python setup step in the Python-Compliance job uses actions/setup-python@v4, which has been flagged by static analysis as outdated. Consider upgrading it to actions/setup-python@v5 for improved stability and compatibility in GitHub Actions.
Proposed Diff:
- uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+ uses: actions/setup-python@v5📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Set up Python 3.11 | |
| uses: actions/setup-python@v4 | |
| with: | |
| python-version: 3.11 | |
| - name: Set up Python 3.11 | |
| - uses: actions/setup-python@v4 | |
| + uses: actions/setup-python@v5 | |
| with: | |
| python-version: 3.11 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
286-286: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
palisadoes
merged commit c16a894
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Style
New Features
Tests & CI Enhancements
Chores