Increased test coverage for create_agenda_item_page

[MohitMaulekhi]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Unit tests and widget tests to improve test coverage for create_agenda_item_page.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2611

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

• Tests are written for all changes made in this PR.
• Test coverage meets or exceeds the current coverage (~90/95%).

Snapshots/Videos:

Summary

Test coverage increased from 75.72% to 100%.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor

  • Streamlined internal state management for the agenda creation screen.

• UI Enhancements

  • Improved interaction reliability for managing attachments, categories, and URLs on the agenda creation page.

• Tests

  • Expanded test coverage to ensure consistent behavior for attachment handling, category selection, and field validations.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes modify the CreateAgendaItemPage widget by making its state class public instead of private and adding keys to several widgets for easier identification during testing and debugging. In addition, the test file has been updated to incorporate a mock image service, adjust mock data keys, and extend the test coverage to include attachment management, category removals, and input validations.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
lib/views/.../create_agenda_item_page.dart	Made the state class public (renamed from _CreateAgendaItemPageState to CreateAgendaItemPageState) and added keys to the ElevatedButton, GridView, and grid items.
test/views/.../create_agenda_item_page_test.dart	Introduced a MockImageService for base64 conversion, updated the mock GraphQL data key from 'id' to '_id', and added tests for attachment, category, URL removal, and field validations.

Possibly related PRs

• Increased test coverage for create_event_page.dart #2737: Refactors the state class of a similar widget (CreateEventPage) to be public, mirroring the changes in CreateAgendaItemPage.

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

• noman2002
• palisadoes
• Dante291

Poem

I'm a rabbit on a coding spree,
Hoping through changes wild and free.
Keys now sparkle, states unveiled,
Tests verify that none have failed.
With each fresh hop, new features gleam—
CodeRabbit smiles in every dream! 🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b2f80a and 1c4ae03.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_agenda_item_page.dart (6 hunks)
• test/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_agenda_item_page_test.dart (7 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Checking codebase

🔇 Additional comments (7)

test/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_agenda_item_page_test.dart (5)

30-37: LGTM! Well-structured mock implementation.

The MockImageService implementation is clean and handles both success and error cases appropriately.

---

129-130: LGTM! Proper test setup.

Correctly unregisters the real service and registers the mock service for isolated testing.

---

184-226: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for category and URL management.

The tests thoroughly verify:

• Category selection and removal
• URL addition and removal
• Category chip deletion UI interaction

Also applies to: 268-286, 287-325

---

335-419: LGTM! Well-structured attachment management tests.

The tests cover:

• Empty attachment state
• Multiple attachment display
• Attachment addition
• Attachment removal

---

420-460: LGTM! Thorough field validation tests.

The tests verify validation rules for:

• Description field
• Title field
• Duration field

lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_agenda_item_page.dart (2)

26-26: LGTM! Improved testability by making state class public.

The change from private to public state class enables better testing access while maintaining encapsulation through the widget's public interface.

Also applies to: 30-30

---

409-410: LGTM! Enhanced widget identification with test keys.

Added keys to critical UI elements:

• Add attachment button
• Attachment grid view
• Individual attachment items
• Attachment images
• Close buttons

Also applies to: 420-421, 433-434, 437-438, 449-450

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.96%. Comparing base (7a21769) to head (1c4ae03).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2738      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             96.37%   96.96%   +0.58%     
====================================================
  Files                   189      189              
  Lines                 10020    10052      +32     
====================================================
+ Hits                   9657     9747      +90     
+ Misses                  363      305      -58     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.