Skip to content

Refactor: Preserve original comments and clarify error handling in placeholder schemas #168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rafia9005
Copy link

@rafia9005 rafia9005 commented Jun 18, 2025

This PR refactors the zogSchema.go file to maintain all original comments for documentation clarity and future maintainability.
Key changes include:

  • All interface and function comments are retained as in the original version.
  • Placeholder schemas for Map, struct, and slice now use clear panic messages for unimplemented methods, providing explicit error signaling.
  • No changes to the core logic for primitive parsing and validation—just improved documentation and error handling in placeholders.
  • This helps contributors and users understand feature status and library behavior, while maintaining compatibility with existing code.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced placeholders for future support of map, struct, and slice schemas.
    • Added ability to set default values for struct and slice schemas.
    • Included basic error handling stubs for new schema types.
  • Chores

    • Added clear error messages to indicate unimplemented features.

…ndling

- Restore and retain all original code comments for schema interfaces and processing functions.
- Ensure placeholder methods (Map, struct, slice schema) provide clear panic messages when used, but do not affect user-facing API or primitive processing.
- No functional changes to primitive parsing/validation; only code hygiene and documentation clarity improved.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces placeholder implementations for map, struct, and slice schemas in the zog package. It adds new schema types and interfaces, each with stub methods that currently panic with "not implemented" messages. A shared error variable for unimplemented functionality is also included, and necessary imports are added.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
zogSchema.go Added placeholder implementations for map, struct, and slice schemas, new interfaces, error var, and imports.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant zog.Map
    participant mapSchema

    User->>zog.Map: Call Map(keySchema, valueSchema)
    zog.Map->>mapSchema: Return new mapSchema instance
    User->>mapSchema: Call Parse/process/validate
    mapSchema-->>User: Panic "not implemented"
Loading

Poem

A stubby hop in schema land,
With maps, structs, slices close at hand.
Not yet complete, they loudly shout,
"Not implemented!"—no need to pout.
Soon they'll grow, with code to show,
For now, dear dev, just watch them go! 🐰

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
zogSchema.go (3)

56-63: Prefer a single sentinel error over hard-coded strings

Three different “not implemented” panic strings are scattered across the new placeholder methods. This duplicates information and makes future text-search clean-ups harder.
Leverage the already–declared ErrNotImplemented so the reason (and its wording) is defined in exactly one place.

-func (m *mapSchema) process(ctx *p.SchemaCtx)  { panic("z.Map() not implemented") }
-func (m *mapSchema) validate(ctx *p.SchemaCtx) { panic("z.Map() not implemented") }
+func (m *mapSchema) process(ctx *p.SchemaCtx)  { panic(ErrNotImplemented) }
+func (m *mapSchema) validate(ctx *p.SchemaCtx) { panic(ErrNotImplemented) }

 ...

-	panic("z.Map() is not implemented yet. See roadmap in README.md")
+	panic(ErrNotImplemented)

Replicate the same change for structSchema and sliceSchema to keep behaviour consistent.


119-121: ErrNotImplemented declared but never referenced

Once the previous comment is applied, this variable will be used.
If you decide to keep the per-method panic strings, either remove ErrNotImplemented or prefix its name with _ to silence go vet unused-variable warnings.


42-49: Minor API ergonomics: accept nil key/value schema in Map

Even as a stub, passing nil for either keySchema or valueSchema currently compiles and panics only later.
Early validation guards make mis-use explicit and cheaper to debug.

 func Map(keySchema, valueSchema ZogSchema) MapZogSchema {
+	if keySchema == nil || valueSchema == nil {
+		panic("z.Map(): keySchema and valueSchema must be non-nil")
+	}
 	return &mapSchema{
 		keySchema:   keySchema,
 		valueSchema: valueSchema,
 	}
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 064e823 and 2d55ba1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • zogSchema.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
zogSchema.go (1)

85-94: Confirm there are no existing structSchema / sliceSchema type collisions

structSchema and sliceSchema are fairly generic names and may already exist in the package history (or in other files) as concrete implementations rather than placeholders.
Name collisions would lead to compilation errors that are easy to miss in a large codebase.

#!/bin/bash
# Search the whole repo for duplicate type declarations.
rg -n $'type (structSchema|sliceSchema) struct'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant