Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(hardware, shared-data, api): Support LV 96 channel #16747

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

ryanthecoder
Copy link
Contributor

@ryanthecoder ryanthecoder commented Nov 8, 2024

Overview

Add all of the string constants for the pipette type, and then update some of the loading/checking of pipette types that were explicitly checking only the 1000ul version of the 96.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

@ryanthecoder ryanthecoder requested review from a team as code owners November 8, 2024 20:53
@ryanthecoder ryanthecoder requested review from shlokamin and removed request for a team November 8, 2024 20:53
Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good as a start, don't think we want to modify that LOW_VOLUME_PIPETTES js variable though

@@ -1774,7 +1774,8 @@
"p1000_single_gen2",
"p1000_single_flex",
"p1000_multi_flex",
"p1000_96"
"p1000_96",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs to be in the shared-data PR I think

@@ -587,7 +588,11 @@ export const WASTE_CHUTE_STAGING_AREA_FIXTURES: CutoutFixtureId[] = [
STAGING_AREA_SLOT_WITH_WASTE_CHUTE_RIGHT_ADAPTER_NO_COVER_FIXTURE,
]

export const LOW_VOLUME_PIPETTES = ['p50_single_flex', 'p50_multi_flex']
export const LOW_VOLUME_PIPETTES = [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this variable is used to cause PD to generate configureForVolume commands before each aspirate - the "low volume" part is "has a lowVolume liquid configuration". Will the LV96 have one?

@ryanthecoder ryanthecoder merged commit 7e1aa5d into edge Nov 12, 2024
67 checks passed
ryanthecoder added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
<!--
Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure
you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing
Guide:

https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests

GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams,
pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to
create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub
markdown, see:

https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax

To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out
the sections below to the best of your ability!
-->

Add all of the string constants for the pipette type, and then update
some of the loading/checking of pipette types that were explicitly
checking only the 1000ul version of the 96.

<!--
Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this
PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources.
-->

<!--
Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the
code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that
support your testing.
-->

<!--
List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the
end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking
changes.
-->

<!--
- What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to
merge?
- Ask questions.
-->

<!--
- Indicate the level of attention this PR needs.
- Provide context to guide reviewers.
- Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects.
- Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your
change may affect some other part of the system.
- For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the
behavior of labware calibration.
- How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's
risks and the risk of future regressions?
- Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is
enough.
-->
ryanthecoder added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
<!--
Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure
you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing
Guide:

https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests

GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams,
pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to
create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub
markdown, see:

https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax

To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out
the sections below to the best of your ability!
-->

Add all of the string constants for the pipette type, and then update
some of the loading/checking of pipette types that were explicitly
checking only the 1000ul version of the 96.

<!--
Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this
PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources.
-->

<!--
Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the
code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that
support your testing.
-->

<!--
List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the
end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking
changes.
-->

<!--
- What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to
merge?
- Ask questions.
-->

<!--
- Indicate the level of attention this PR needs.
- Provide context to guide reviewers.
- Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects.
- Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your
change may affect some other part of the system.
- For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the
behavior of labware calibration.
- How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's
risks and the risk of future regressions?
- Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is
enough.
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants