Skip to content

Add WAM paper: Embodied.cpp: A Portable Inference Runtime of Embodied AI Models on Heterogeneous Robots#51

Open
279object wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
robot/add-2607.02501
Open

Add WAM paper: Embodied.cpp: A Portable Inference Runtime of Embodied AI Models on Heterogeneous Robots#51
279object wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
robot/add-2607.02501

Conversation

@279object

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Paper

  • Title: Embodied.cpp: A Portable Inference Runtime of Embodied AI Models on Heterogeneous Robots
  • Short name: Embodied.cpp
  • arXiv ID: 2607.02501v1
  • Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02501
  • Authors: Ling Xu, Chuyu Han, Borui Li, Hao Wu, Shiqi Jiang, Ting Cao, Chuanyou Li, Sheng Zhong, Shuai Wang
  • Published: 2026-07-02
  • arXiv categories: cs.RO, cs.CV, cs.OS
  • Matched keywords: WAM, world-action model, world-action models

README Entry

- **Embodied.cpp**: "Embodied.cpp: A Portable Inference Runtime of Embodied AI Models on Heterogeneous Robots", arXiv 2026. ![](https://img.shields.io/badge/Needs--Taxonomy--Review-64748b)
  [[📄 Paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02501)]

Robot Decision

Reason

Paper presents an embodied inference runtime with explicit first-class support and benchmarking for world-action models, though it is infrastructure rather than a new WAM method.

Evidence

  • abstract names world-action models as supported embodied model family
  • evaluates a preliminary WAM benchmark using a LingBot-VA Transformer block
  • related work analyzes WAM subtypes such as predict-then-act and unified AR-modeling WAMs

Taxonomy Evidence

  • portable C++ inference runtime for embodied models
  • evaluated on preliminary WAM benchmark using a LingBot-VA Transformer block

Needs taxonomy review: fallback README heading/badge was used because taxonomy.toml has no README mapping for this classification.

Human Review Checklist

  • This paper belongs in the WAM survey
  • README section is correct
  • Badges are correct
  • Short name is correct
  • Paper link is correct
  • Merge this PR if accepted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant