Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Settings for Gromacs MD protocol #6

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

[WIP] Settings for Gromacs MD protocol #6

merged 24 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

hannahbaumann
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Jul 15, 2024

Hello @hannahbaumann! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 59:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
Line 70:80: E501 line too long (87 > 79 characters)
Line 125:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
Line 233:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters)
Line 414:80: E501 line too long (85 > 79 characters)
Line 551:80: E501 line too long (85 > 79 characters)

Comment last updated at 2024-09-04 14:51:20 UTC

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann changed the title Settings for Gromacs MD protocol [WIP] Settings for Gromacs MD protocol Jul 16, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

openfe_gromacs/protocols/gromacs_md/md_settings.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openfe_gromacs/protocols/gromacs_md/md_settings.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +101 to +102
by default set by the verlet-buffer-tolerance and
verlet-buffer-pressure-tolerance options and the value of rlist is ignored.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth setting rlist if we don't have these as options?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be useful for energy minimization?

openfe_gromacs/protocols/gromacs_md/md_settings.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openfe_gromacs/protocols/gromacs_md/md_settings.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +516 to +520
energygrps: str = ""
"""
Group(s) for which to write to write short-ranged non-bonded potential
energies to the energy file (not supported on GPUs)
"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because of the GPU limitation, I think it's ok here to just not have them? Unless you think there's a use for them.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this could be useful for troubleshooting, e.g. to see whether interactions are excluded between certain groups or not (I've used this for SepTop). But maybe this doesn't need to be user interfacing?

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann merged commit e70ad85 into main Sep 19, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann deleted the md_settings branch September 19, 2024 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants