Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump rspec-expectations from 3.10.1 to 3.12.2 #740

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 9, 2023

Bumps rspec-expectations from 3.10.1 to 3.12.2.

Changelog

Sourced from rspec-expectations's changelog.

3.12.2 / 2023-01-07

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Prevent deprecation warning when using the exist matcher with Dir. (Steve Dierker, #1398)

3.12.1 / 2022-12-16

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Pass keyword arguments through to aliased (and thus negated) matchers. (Jon Rowe, #1394)
  • When handling failures in an aggregated_failures block (or example) prevent the failure list leaking out. (Maciek Rząsa, #1392)

3.12.0 / 2022-10-26

Full Changelog

Enhancements:

  • Add an_array_matching alias for match_array to improve readability as an argument matcher. (Mark Schneider, #1361)

3.11.1 / 2022-09-12

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Allow the contain_exactly matcher to be reused by resetting its internals on matches? (@​bclayman-sq, #1326)
  • Using the exist matcher on FileTest no longer produces a deprecation warning. (Ryo Nakamura, #1383)

3.11.0 / 2022-02-09

Full Changelog

Enhancements:

  • Return true from aggregate_failures when no exception occurs. (Jon Rowe, #1225)

Deprecations:

  • Print a deprecation message when using the implicit block expectation syntax. (Phil Pirozhkov, #1139)

3.10.2 / 2022-01-14

Full Changelog

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [rspec-expectations](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations) from 3.10.1 to 3.12.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/blob/main/Changelog.md)
- [Commits](rspec/rspec-expectations@v3.10.1...v3.12.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: rspec-expectations
  dependency-type: indirect
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants