fix: E2E test don't assert flushdb's result #406
Conversation
Walkthrough本次更改优化了多个测试文件中的数据库清理逻辑。所有文件中的 Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- tests/hash_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/key_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/list_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/set_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/key_test.go (2)
55-55: 请确认是否需要保留TODO注释。请确认是否需要保留"TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync"注释。如果不再需要，请删除。
56-57: 更改已批准。将同步的
FlushDB方法替换为异步的FlushDBAsync方法，并将等待时间从1秒增加到2秒的更改已批准。tests/zset_test.go (2)
55-55: 请确认是否需要保留TODO注释。请确认是否需要保留"TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync"注释。如果不再需要，请删除。
56-57: 更改已批准。将同步的
FlushDB方法替换为异步的FlushDBAsync方法，并将等待时间从1秒增加到2秒的更改已批准。
tests/hash_test.go
Outdated
| // TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync | ||
| Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
| time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
使用异步方法清理数据库
将 FlushDB 替换为 FlushDBAsync 可以提高测试效率，但需要确保异步操作完成后再进行下一步操作。
建议：可以考虑使用 WaitForCompletion 方法来确保异步操作完成，而不是简单地增加等待时间。
// TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync
Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
client.WaitForCompletion(ctx)There was a problem hiding this comment.
目前 pikiwidb 没有完全支持 FlushDBAsync
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@luky116 了解，目前 FlushDBAsync 尚未完全支持。现有的 FlushDB 配合延时的做法是暂时的解决方案。建议我们继续关注 FlushDBAsync 支持的进展，以便在未来进行优化。感谢你的澄清！
tests/list_test.go
Outdated
| // TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync | ||
| Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
| time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
使用异步方法清理数据库
将 FlushDB 替换为 FlushDBAsync 可以提高测试效率，但需要确保异步操作完成后再进行下一步操作。
建议：可以考虑使用 WaitForCompletion 方法来确保异步操作完成，而不是简单地增加等待时间。
// TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync
Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
client.WaitForCompletion(ctx)
tests/set_test.go
Outdated
| // TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync | ||
| Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) | ||
| time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
使用异步方法清理数据库
将 FlushDB 替换为 FlushDBAsync 可以提高测试效率，但需要确保异步操作完成后再进行下一步操作。
建议：可以考虑使用 WaitForCompletion 方法来确保异步操作完成，而不是简单地增加等待时间。
// TODO use FlushDB instead of FlushDBAsync
Expect(client.FlushDBAsync(ctx).Err()).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
client.WaitForCompletion(ctx)
luky116
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- src/pikiwidb.cc (1 hunks)
- tests/hash_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/key_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/list_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/set_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- tests/hash_test.go
- tests/key_test.go
- tests/list_test.go
- tests/set_test.go
- tests/zset_test.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/pikiwidb.cc (1)
286-286: 请验证初始化顺序的更改是否会影响应用程序的行为。将
InitLimit()函数调用移动到InitLogs()之后可能会影响应用程序的初始化顺序。请确保此更改不会引入任何副作用或依赖关系。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/consistency_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml (1)
70-70: 更改已批准。添加
--ginkgo.v标志有助于调试测试输出。tests/consistency_test.go (4)
50-52: 临时解决方案：注释掉FlushDB的断言。由于已知的错误（问题 #401），暂时注释掉了
FlushDB的断言。请确保在错误修复后恢复这些断言。
56-58: 临时解决方案：注释掉FlushDB的断言。由于已知的错误（问题 #401），暂时注释掉了
FlushDB的断言。请确保在错误修复后恢复这些断言。
99-101: 临时解决方案：注释掉FlushDB的断言。由于已知的错误（问题 #401），暂时注释掉了
FlushDB的断言。请确保在错误修复后恢复这些断言。
116-118: 临时解决方案：注释掉FlushDB的断言。由于已知的错误（问题 #401），暂时注释掉了
FlushDB的断言。请确保在错误修复后恢复这些断言。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/cmd_admin.cc (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/cmd_admin.cc (2)
68-70: 添加 DEFER 块以确保解锁数据库此更改通过添加
DEFER块来确保无论函数如何退出，数据库锁都能被释放。这是一个重要的改进，可以防止潜在的死锁或资源泄漏。
78-81: 改进错误处理机制新的错误处理机制在
Open()操作不成功时，设置客户端错误响应并提前退出函数。这提高了命令的健壮性，确保在失败时向客户端提供更清晰的反馈。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- src/cmd_admin.cc (1 hunks)
- tests/consistency_test.go (3 hunks)
- tests/hash_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/key_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/list_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/set_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- src/cmd_admin.cc
- tests/consistency_test.go
- tests/hash_test.go
- tests/key_test.go
- tests/list_test.go
- tests/set_test.go
- tests/zset_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/print_log.sh (1)
1-1: 使用zsh可能导致静态分析工具问题ShellCheck 仅支持 sh/bash/dash/ksh 脚本。使用 zsh 可能会导致一些静态分析工具无法正确分析脚本。
Tools
Shellcheck
[error] 1-1: ShellCheck only supports sh/bash/dash/ksh scripts. Sorry!
(SC1071)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml (2 hunks)
- tests/hash_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/key_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/list_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/print_log.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/set_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/pikiwidb.yml
- tests/hash_test.go
- tests/key_test.go
- tests/list_test.go
- tests/set_test.go
- tests/zset_test.go
Additional context used
Shellcheck
tests/print_log.sh
[error] 1-1: ShellCheck only supports sh/bash/dash/ksh scripts. Sorry!
(SC1071)
Additional comments not posted (8)
tests/print_log.sh (8)
3-3: LGTM!这行代码正确地将当前目录设置为脚本所在目录。
5-5: LGTM!这行代码正确地遍历匹配特定命名模式的日志文件。
6-6: LGTM!这行代码正确地检查文件是否存在。
7-7: LGTM!这行代码正确地打印分隔线，有助于视觉上分隔日志文件内容。
8-8: LGTM!这行代码正确地打印文件名，有助于识别正在打印的日志文件。
9-9: LGTM!这行代码正确地打印文件内容。
10-10: LGTM!这行代码正确地打印空行，有助于视觉上分隔日志文件内容。
12-12: LGTM!这行代码正确地结束循环。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- tests/consistency_test.go (4 hunks)
- tests/hash_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/key_test.go (3 hunks)
- tests/list_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/set_test.go (2 hunks)
- tests/zset_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- tests/consistency_test.go
- tests/hash_test.go
- tests/key_test.go
- tests/list_test.go
- tests/set_test.go
- tests/zset_test.go
1、flushdb 的返回值直接打印日志，不 assert
2、执行完成 E2E 的测试，将 Pika 的日志进行打印
fix: #401
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Improvements
新功能