Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core: Improves performance of orm_cached with an in-memory cache #1029

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Daverball
Copy link
Member

Commit message

Core: Improves performance of orm_cached with an in-memory cache

TYPE: Performance

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have tested my code thoroughly by hand
  • I have added tests for my changes

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (cc4d60f) 86.74% compared to head (b091740) 86.62%.
Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1029      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.74%   86.62%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files        1171     1171              
  Lines       78416    78450      +34     
==========================================
- Hits        68019    67959      -60     
- Misses      10397    10491      +94     
Files Coverage Δ
src/onegov/core/csv.py 95.55% <100.00%> (ø)
src/onegov/core/orm/utils.py 68.96% <76.92%> (+6.46%) ⬆️
src/onegov/core/orm/cache.py 82.35% <89.47%> (+0.61%) ⬆️

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants