-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 149
replace MessageRunMode with a struct #373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Assigning to @magicxyyz to clean up the conflicts and resolve review feedback. |
|
I want this to wait until after we cut the Arbos-40 WasmModuleRoot |
|
|
||
| func ApplyTransactionWithResultFilter(evm *vm.EVM, gp *GasPool, statedb *state.StateDB, header *types.Header, tx *types.Transaction, usedGas *uint64, runMode MessageRunMode, resultFilter func(*ExecutionResult) error) (*types.Receipt, *ExecutionResult, error) { | ||
| msg, err := TransactionToMessage(tx, types.MakeSigner(evm.ChainConfig(), header.Number, header.Time, evm.Context.ArbOSVersion), header.BaseFee, runMode) | ||
| func ApplyTransactionWithResultFilter(evm *vm.EVM, gp *GasPool, statedb *state.StateDB, header *types.Header, tx *types.Transaction, usedGas *uint64, runCtx *MessageRunContext, resultFilter func(*ExecutionResult) error) (*types.Receipt, *ExecutionResult, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we put resultFilter into MessageRunContext? (not urgent)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another small suggestion for later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This PR:
MessageRunModeenum withMessageRunContextstruct, that apart from run mode now contains wasm cache tag and wasm targets listcachingDBandethdb.DatabaseResolves NIT-2827