dns: improved handling of corrupt additionals #12349
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ticket: 7228 That means log the rest of queries and answers, even if the final field additionals is corrupt. Set an event in this case.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12349 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.23% 83.23%
=======================================
Files 912 912
Lines 257647 257673 +26
=======================================
+ Hits 214450 214475 +25
- Misses 43197 43198 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
|
Information: QA ran without warnings. Pipeline 24108 |
victorjulien
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2025
Merged
|
Merged in #12371, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7228
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2032
#11794 rebased after latest DNS changes (like #11870 )
@jasonish what do you think about it ?