Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next/658/20241204/v1 #12222

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

victorjulien and others added 2 commits December 4, 2024 14:49
Threads are initialized sequentially to allow for a predictable mapping
of threads and queues. Not all parts of the start up need to be done
sequentially. The setting up of the rings can be very expensive, taking
of a couple of hundred milliseconds. The ring setup doesn't need to be
done sequentially though.

This patch releases the thread early, after bind but before the ring
setups.

Ticket: OISF#7272.
Ticket: 7311

If response_status_number is not a valid poisitive integer,
we should not try to parse it again, and fail again,
but just log the raw string.
@victorjulien victorjulien requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2024 16:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.19%. Comparing base (b58b886) to head (09ba69c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12222      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.18%   83.19%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         912      912              
  Lines      257169   257166       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits       213914   213938      +24     
+ Misses      43255    43228      -27     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 61.00% <33.33%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
livemode 19.41% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pcap 44.39% <33.33%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 62.78% <33.33%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 59.18% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information:

ERROR: QA failed on SURI_TLPR1_alerts_cmp.

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPR1_stats_chk
.app_layer.flow.dcerpc_tcp 40 42 105.0%

Pipeline 23672

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23681

@victorjulien victorjulien merged commit 09ba69c into OISF:master Dec 5, 2024
61 checks passed
@victorjulien victorjulien deleted the next/658/20241204/v1 branch December 5, 2024 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants