Adds a test about filestore #1522
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Dec 7, 2023
Closed
That it does not store too many files
catenacyber
force-pushed
the
filestore-6388-v4.1
branch
from
549fbbd to
6e5acee
Compare
|
Replaced by #1524 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket
Redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6392
Requires Suricata PR to come
#1427 with only test that currently fails master
min-version is set to 8
Backport to 7 should be clean
But backport to 6 would be completely different
I propose to do S-V PRs to lower the min-version to pass this test as Suricata PR get merged