Ssh newkeys 6578 v3.1 #1508
Closed
Ssh newkeys 6578 v3.1 #1508
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
catenacyber
added
tests pass
as a tls event can come from a flush after setting no_inspection
We do not want to test number of alerts on every pseudo-packets Ticket: 6578
catenacyber
force-pushed
the
ssh-newkeys-6578-v3.1
branch
from
b7a8ffd to
a8e848e
Compare
|
Exception policy test fix looks good to me, good catch!! |
Closed
Closed
|
Needed rebased in #1586 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket
Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6578
Prerequisite for OISF/suricata#9961
#1507 with only prerequisite parts to be merged before Suricata
@jufajardini do I miss something in the point of this test ?