Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Anatomic Site Concept ID: BodyPartExamined (0018,0015) vs AnatomicRegionSequence (0008,2218) #10

Open
kyulee-jeon opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kyulee-jeon
Copy link

kyulee-jeon commented Jul 10, 2024

For future automation of ETL processes, we may need to select appropriate standard tags as sources. Attributes like 'BodyPartExamined' and 'AnatomicRegionSequence' contain information about the anatomic site of the imaging.

Key Points:

  • (DICOM Standard) According to DICOM PS3.16, 'AnatomicRegionSequence' defines a more diverse and detailed Context Group compared to 'BodyPartExamined', which reflects historical or clinically well-recognized usage.
  • Insights from our institution's sample data indicate 'BodyPartExamined' captured more information for Chest CT and Brain MR, but results may vary across institutions and modalities.
Modality Captured Values for 'BodyPartExamined' Captured Values for 'AnatomicRegionSequence'
Brain MR 'BRAIN', 'NECKCHESTABDOMEN', 'HEAD', nan {Code Value: T-D1100, Code Meaning: HEAD}, nan
Chest CT 'CHEST', 'ABDOMEN', nan nan

Discussion Point:

  • I am curious about how this appears in other institutions and different imaging studies.

References:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant