Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16][MIG] auth_api_key_server_env #455 #525

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 9, 2023

Conversation

florian-dacosta
Copy link
Contributor

I open a new PR for this one, as last one was closed because stale.
But I believe this module is still needed, maybe a small review for past contributors/reviewers could help moving forward
@simahawk @qgroulard @yankinmax @SilvioC2C

@florian-dacosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@simahawk I have fixed pre-commit and the test + and to your comments, thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@simahawk simahawk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rewrite the commit to auth_api_key_server_env: use tech_name?
Pre-approving

auth_api_key_server_env/models/auth_api_key.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

simahawk commented Sep 9, 2023

Food for thoughts: we might want to refactor this and the main module in favor of core res.users.apikeys model.

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-525-by-simahawk-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 5a9feb6 into OCA:16.0 Sep 9, 2023
6 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 864231b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants