Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][ADD] l10n_it_sdd_cbi: adding module for CBI SDD Italy #4480

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 14.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Borruso
Copy link
Contributor

@Borruso Borruso commented Dec 3, 2024

No description provided.

@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@Borruso non potrebbe essere integrato in https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/tree/14.0/l10n_it_sct_cbi ?

@Borruso
Copy link
Contributor Author

Borruso commented Dec 4, 2024

@Borruso non potrebbe essere integrato in https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/tree/14.0/l10n_it_sct_cbi ?

poterbbe ma come nel repo https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment account_banking_sepa_credit_transfer e account_banking_sepa_direct_debit sono separati

@primes2h
Copy link
Contributor

primes2h commented Dec 4, 2024

@Borruso non potrebbe essere integrato in https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/tree/14.0/l10n_it_sct_cbi ?

poterbbe ma come nel repo https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment account_banking_sepa_credit_transfer e account_banking_sepa_direct_debit sono separati

Anche per me ha senso tenerli separati, però sarebbe meglio uniformare il nome a quello del modulo già presente nel repo.
l10n_it_sct_cbi
l10n_it_sdd_cbi

@Borruso Borruso force-pushed the 14.0-add-l10n_it_sepa_direct_debit branch from 3b29c6c to d4036c7 Compare December 5, 2024 15:30
@Borruso Borruso changed the title [ADD] l10n_it_sepa_direct_debit: adding module for CBI SDD Italy [14.0][ADD] l10n_it_sdd_cbi: adding module for CBI SDD Italy Dec 5, 2024
@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@Borruso puoi rinominare come suggerito?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants