Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gitlab: update prometheus-client-mmap gem to fix aarch64 #369636

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xanderio
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the nixosTests for gitlab are failing on aarch64-linux do to an error within prometheus-client-mmap ("failed with weakmap value was not a string"), the update to 1.1.2 should fix this accouring to upstream.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ruby/gems/prometheus-client-mmap/-/issues/68#top

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: ruby 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Dec 31, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS label Dec 31, 2024
@xanderio
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ofborg test gitlab

@xanderio xanderio marked this pull request as ready for review December 31, 2024 15:17
@xanderio xanderio requested review from K900 and leona-ya December 31, 2024 15:22
leona-ya
leona-ya previously approved these changes Jan 1, 2025
@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Jan 1, 2025
else "sha256-XuQZPbFWqPHlrJvllkvLl1FjKeoAUbi8oKDrS2rY1KM=";
then "sha256-pNzW2fQZDcuqu8apv3GU7lUC/H1cX5WRifBBQlbE8+s="
else
if lib.versionAtLeast attrs.version "1.1.1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh? Does this make sense? This then block is never reached.

@leona-ya leona-ya dismissed their stale review January 1, 2025 16:58

Found strange change

@wegank wegank removed the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Jan 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 6.topic: ruby 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants