python3Packages.cupy: mark as broken

[samuela]

Description of changes

See #179912 (comment). Cupy has been broken for a minute. This PR just marks it as such for the sake of CI/nixpkgs-review.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[winterqt]

@ofborg eval

[samuela]

eval is hopefully fixed after rebasing to latest master in f77deac

[winterqt]

eval is hopefully fixed after rebasing to latest master in f77deac

For what it's worth, OfBorg automatically merges your changes into master, if that's what you were worried about.

[samuela]

For what it's worth, OfBorg automatically merges your changes into master, if that's what you were worried about.

I believe eval was broken on master due to my own goof in #179912. So I believe a rebase was necessary 🤷‍♂️