-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use faster multi-contains in rlike
regex rewrite
#11810
Merged
thirtiseven
merged 8 commits into
NVIDIA:branch-25.02
from
thirtiseven:multiple_contains_write
Dec 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cedcd58
use multiple contains in rlike rewrite
thirtiseven 14900dd
memory leak
thirtiseven ee65a32
address comment
thirtiseven 24e75a2
save a temp columnvector
thirtiseven ca1ba0c
foreach
thirtiseven c84e05e
foldLeft again
thirtiseven 4f33192
withResource
thirtiseven 613cb1e
Use AST
thirtiseven File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not work. We will get double frees if there is an exception.
boolCvs.tail
is not updated when the or happens. That is why I wrote the code that I did.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a complex
safeMap
so that we can have it be safe and at the same time make the resulting code simple.spark-rapids/sql-plugin/src/main/scala-2.12/com/nvidia/spark/rapids/implicits.scala
Lines 155 to 238 in 561068c
Could we just add a
safeReduce
into implicits.scala instead of trying so hard to make this small piece of code simple?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Never mind it is just a helper function
safeReduceAndClose
. We don't need to jump through hoops to make the code simple if inherently what we want to do is not simple.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes you are right, I missed that point and thought an outer
withResource
would lead to double closes. Update back towithResource
for now.