Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement debuginfo bool name fix (numba/numba#9888) in numba-cuda #106

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gmarkall
Copy link
Collaborator

@gmarkall gmarkall commented Jan 8, 2025

As a workaround until numba/numba#9888 is merged and available in an upstream Numba release, we interject our own modified bytecode translation pass that names bools correctly ($bool<N> as oppoosed to bool<N>).

To avoid duplicating the whole untyped pipeline definition, we take the definition from upstream Numba and modify it to use our pass.

"In progress" as a test is required.

As a workaround until numba/numba#9888 is merged and available in an
upstream Numba release, we interject our own modified bytecode
translation pass that names bools correctly (`$bool<N>` as oppoosed to
`bool<N>`).

To avoid duplicating the whole untyped pipeline definition, we take the
definition from upstream Numba and modify it to use our pass.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant