Skip to content

chore(docs): apply v0.0.105 follow-up and bump Fern - #8764

Merged
cv merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/post-tag-docs-audit-20260810-100048
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

chore(docs): apply v0.0.105 follow-up and bump Fern#8764
cv merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
codex/post-tag-docs-audit-20260810-100048

Conversation

@miyoungc

@miyoungc miyoungc commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

This change applies the bounded v0.0.105 documentation follow-up and upgrades the Fern CLI from 5.80.1 to 5.92.4.
The Fern upgrade now includes a repository-owned dependency review and executable evidence that binds the production pin to the reviewed package.

Changes

  • Correct the v0.0.105 release entry and complete the owning documentation for provider validation, failed-startup recovery, uninstall ownership, and ARM64 GPU proof behavior.
  • Narrow docs/.docs-skip so a mixed commit does not hide unrelated user-visible behavior.
  • Upgrade the Fern CLI pin to 5.92.4.
  • Add the Fern 5.92.4 dependency review, including artifact identity, provenance, source-range, dependency-closure, advisory, license, and residual-risk evidence.
  • Update the Fern contract test so the production pin must match the reviewed target.

Type of Change

  • Code change (feature, bug fix, or refactor)
  • Code change with doc updates
  • Doc only (prose changes, no code sample modifications)
  • Doc only (includes code sample changes)

Quality Gates

  • Tests added or updated for changed behavior
  • Existing tests cover changed behavior — justification:
  • Tests not applicable — justification:
  • Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes
  • Docs not applicable — justification:
  • Sensitive paths changed (security, policy, credentials, preflight, onboarding, inference, runner, sandbox, or messaging)
  • Sensitive-path review completed or maintainer-approved waiver recorded — reviewer/approval link/justification: Security review passed for the current branch revision.
  • Non-success, skipped, or missing CI check accepted by maintainer — check name, approval link, and follow-up issue:

Documentation Writer Review

  • Documentation writer subagent reviewed the completed changes
  • Result: docs-updated
  • Evidence: The writer corrected the timeout description to match source behavior, tightened the Fern evidence wording, confirmed the remaining documentation against the implementation, and reran the focused dependency test, documentation build, route validation, and diff checks successfully.
  • Agent: Codex Desktop

DGX Station Hardware Evidence

  • Tested on DGX Station
  • Tested commit:
  • Station profile/scenario:
  • Result:
  • Supporting evidence:

Verification

  • PR description includes a Signed-off-by: line and every commit appears as Verified in GitHub
  • Normal pre-commit, commit-msg, and pre-push hooks passed, or npm run validate:pr passed after refreshing origin/main when hooks were skipped or unavailable
  • Targeted behavior tests pass for the current change set, or tests are marked not applicable above — command/result or justification: the Fern dependency-review and staging-workflow tests passed 6 tests after the branch refresh.
  • Applicable broad gate passed — npm test for broad runtime/test-harness changes; npm run check for repo-wide validation/coverage changes — command/result: Not applicable to this bounded documentation and docs-tooling change.
  • Quality Gates section completed with required justifications or waivers
  • No secrets, API keys, or credentials committed
  • npm run docs builds without warnings (doc changes only) — the build completed with zero errors and two existing warnings.
  • Doc pages follow the style guide (doc changes only)
  • New doc pages include SPDX header and frontmatter (new pages only) — the new internal security review has the required SPDX header and is not a published Fern page.

Additional local checks after refreshing from current main: test-title policy passed, Vitest project membership was exact across 2,297 candidates and seven projects, source-shape policy passed with 117 valid exceptions, and git diff --check passed.


Signed-off-by: Miyoung Choi miyoungc@nvidia.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified feature-skip behavior for mixed changes.
    • Updated the changelog with improvements to recovery, uninstall, Hermes operations, network policies, dashboards, agent output, and container compatibility.
    • Documented retry behavior for structured tool calls that exceed output-token limits.
    • Expanded sandbox recovery and uninstall guidance, including Docker resource handling.
    • Improved GPU passthrough and troubleshooting guidance, including CUDA proof timeouts and validation.
  • Chores
    • Updated documentation tooling to a newer version.

Signed-off-by: Miyoung Choi <miyoungc@nvidia.com>
@miyoungc miyoungc self-assigned this Aug 10, 2026
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates clarify feature auditing, validation retries, sandbox operations, GPU proof behavior, troubleshooting, changelog content, and Fern version metadata.

Changes

Documentation and metadata

Layer / File(s) Summary
Behavior and sandbox guidance
docs/.docs-skip, docs/inference/understand-provider-validation.mdx, docs/manage-sandboxes/*, docs/changelog/2026-08-07.mdx
The documentation now describes selective feature skipping, structured-tool validation retries, OpenClaw recovery guidance, preservation of unrelated Docker resources during uninstall, and restored inference and operational improvements.
GPU detection and proof guidance
docs/reference/commands.mdx, docs/reference/troubleshooting.mdx
GPU documentation now describes placeholder-name validation, ARM64 CUDA proof, and the NEMOCLAW_WSL_GPU_PROOF_TIMEOUT_MS setting. Troubleshooting guidance reflects image-pull and workload duration.
Fern version and dependency review
fern/fern.config.json, test/fern-dependency-review.test.ts, docs/security/fern-5.92.4-dependency-review.md
Fern configuration, dependency review expectations, and security review documentation now use version 5.92.4.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested labels: chore

Suggested reviewers: cv

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the two main changes: the v0.0.105 documentation follow-up and the Fern version upgrade.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/post-tag-docs-audit-20260810-100048

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-code-quality

github-code-quality Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code Coverage Overview

Languages: TypeScript

TypeScript / code-coverage/plugin

The overall coverage in commit 05e840d in the codex/post-tag-docs-... branch remains at 96%, unchanged from commit 2afba61 in the main branch.

TypeScript / code-coverage/cli

The overall coverage in commit 05e840d in the codex/post-tag-docs-... branch remains at 82%, unchanged from commit 2afba61 in the main branch.

Show a code coverage summary of the most impacted files.
File main 2afba61 codex/post-tag-docs-... 05e840d +/-
src/lib/actions...er-lifecycle.ts 94% 85% -9%
src/lib/actions...aged-profile.ts 88% 84% -4%
src/lib/state/o...config-merge.ts 92% 92% 0%
src/lib/agent/m...fest-readers.ts 97% 97% 0%
src/lib/credentials/store.ts 57% 57% 0%
src/lib/onboard...ad/authority.ts 95% 95% 0%
src/lib/sandbox...rce-identity.ts 86% 86% 0%
src/lib/agent/defs.ts 94% 95% +1%
src/lib/state/g...way-registry.ts 97% 98% +1%
src/lib/state/config-io.ts 93% 95% +2%

Updated August 11, 2026 00:42 UTC

Signed-off-by: Miyoung Choi <miyoungc@nvidia.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Review Advisor — No blocking findings reported

Advisor assessment: No blocking advisor findings reported
Next action: No advisor follow-up needed.
Findings: 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions

Model lanes

  • GPT-5.6 Terra (primary): Completed · high confidence · 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra (second opinion): Failed after a partial review · low confidence · 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions

Second-opinion terminology and E2E selections are advisory. Live E2E does not run automatically for pull requests.

2 semantic terminology decisions

Terminology decisions are advisory. They affect the assessment only when a separate finding identifies concrete semantic impact.

  • established — bounded Docker CUDA workload at docs/reference/commands.mdx:903: Keep the established term.
  • established — reasoning content at docs/inference/understand-provider-validation.mdx:42: Keep the established term.

E2E guidance

Advisory only. A maintainer can dispatch the default E2E suite against this exact revision.

Recommended E2E: None

Workflow run details

This automated review informs maintainers. Warnings and suggestions do not require a response. A maintainer decides whether to merge.

@miyoungc miyoungc changed the title chore(deps): bump Fern and complete docs follow-up chore(docs): apply v0.0.105 follow-up and bump Fern Aug 10, 2026
@miyoungc
miyoungc marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2026 23:40
@miyoungc miyoungc added area: docs Documentation, examples, guides, or docs build v0.0.107 labels Aug 10, 2026

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/reference/commands.mdx`:
- Line 4541: Update the NEMOCLAW_WSL_GPU_PROOF_TIMEOUT_MS documentation to
describe the parser’s actual contract: any positive finite number of
milliseconds is accepted, while invalid or non-positive values use the default.
Do not describe the value as an integer unless the corresponding parser
validation is also changed.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: a17103f3-6635-44df-8d5a-2eacc0dcb37f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8232eb and 5f7f18e.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • docs/.docs-skip
  • docs/changelog/2026-08-07.mdx
  • docs/inference/understand-provider-validation.mdx
  • docs/manage-sandboxes/recover-rebuild-sandboxes.mdx
  • docs/manage-sandboxes/uninstall-nemoclaw.mdx
  • docs/reference/commands.mdx
  • docs/reference/troubleshooting.mdx
  • fern/fern.config.json
  • test/fern-dependency-review.test.ts

Comment thread docs/reference/commands.mdx Outdated
@apurvvkumaria apurvvkumaria self-assigned this Aug 11, 2026
Signed-off-by: Apurv Kumaria <akumaria@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Apurv Kumaria <akumaria@nvidia.com>
@apurvvkumaria

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Security review: PASS for the current branch revision.

Scope: documentation source plus the Fern docs-only tool upgrade to 5.92.4. The change does not alter shipped runtime code, credentials, policy enforcement, sandbox boundaries, or product network behavior.

Evidence reviewed:

  • the npm artifact matches the recorded registry integrity, signature, provenance run, and source revision;
  • all 194 intervening source commits were covered by contiguous review ranges;
  • the current and target dependency graphs each contain the same 11-package closure;
  • both production dependency audits report zero findings;
  • archive structure, licenses, lifecycle-script surface, and the existing BAML/Scarf path are unchanged;
  • the full evidence and residual-risk dispositions are recorded in docs/security/fern-5.92.4-dependency-review.md.

Local validation after refreshing from current main: focused tests passed (6 tests), repository structure checks passed, and the documentation build completed with zero errors and two existing warnings.

@apurvvkumaria apurvvkumaria left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the documentation follow-up and Fern 5.92.4 upgrade after the branch refresh. The source-behavior wording, dependency evidence, focused tests, repository structure checks, documentation build, DCO declarations, and GitHub commit verification are complete. I found no remaining correctness, documentation, or security issue in the current change set. Required CI and automated review still need to finish before this PR is ready for the release train.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@test/fern-dependency-review.test.ts`:
- Around line 48-52: Strengthen the assertions for the “Complete Source Range
Ledger” rows in this test by verifying the expected range labels begin at
5.80.1, end at 5.92.4, and are contiguous, along with their per-range commit
counts. Keep the existing row-count and aggregate checks, and avoid relying only
on totals that could remain unchanged when ranges are omitted or replaced.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: f7c73f34-ae4e-48c5-884a-c7bf3e59f9ce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f7f18e and 05e840d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/reference/commands.mdx
  • docs/security/fern-5.92.4-dependency-review.md
  • fern/fern.config.json
  • test/fern-dependency-review.test.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • fern/fern.config.json
  • docs/reference/commands.mdx

Comment on lines +48 to +52
const ranges = tableRows("Complete Source Range Ledger");
const concerns = tableRows("Concern Ledger");

expect(ranges).toHaveLength(21);
expect(ranges.reduce((total, [, commits]) => total + Number(commits), 0)).toBe(225);
expect(ranges).toHaveLength(5);
expect(ranges.reduce((total, [, commits]) => total + Number(commits), 0)).toBe(194);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Assert the source-range contract, not only its totals.

Lines 51-52 verify only five rows and an aggregate of 194 commits. These checks do not prove that the rows start at 5.80.1, end at 5.92.4, and remain contiguous. A ledger can omit or replace a range while preserving both totals. Assert the expected range labels and per-range commit counts, or validate endpoint contiguity.

Proposed assertion
-    expect(ranges).toHaveLength(5);
-    expect(ranges.reduce((total, [, commits]) => total + Number(commits), 0)).toBe(194);
+    expect(ranges.map(([range, commits]) => [range, commits])).toEqual([
+      ["`5.80.1` to `5.80.5`", "60"],
+      ["`5.80.5` to `5.86.0`", "42"],
+      ["`5.86.0` to `5.89.6`", "40"],
+      ["`5.89.6` to `5.92.2`", "46"],
+      ["`5.92.2` to `5.92.4`", "6"],
+    ]);

As per path instructions, review tests for behavioral confidence rather than implementation lock-in.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const ranges = tableRows("Complete Source Range Ledger");
const concerns = tableRows("Concern Ledger");
expect(ranges).toHaveLength(21);
expect(ranges.reduce((total, [, commits]) => total + Number(commits), 0)).toBe(225);
expect(ranges).toHaveLength(5);
expect(ranges.reduce((total, [, commits]) => total + Number(commits), 0)).toBe(194);
const ranges = tableRows("Complete Source Range Ledger");
const concerns = tableRows("Concern Ledger");
expect(ranges.map(([range, commits]) => [range, commits])).toEqual([
["`5.80.1` to `5.80.5`", "60"],
["`5.80.5` to `5.86.0`", "42"],
["`5.86.0` to `5.89.6`", "40"],
["`5.89.6` to `5.92.2`", "46"],
["`5.92.2` to `5.92.4`", "6"],
]);
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@test/fern-dependency-review.test.ts` around lines 48 - 52, Strengthen the
assertions for the “Complete Source Range Ledger” rows in this test by verifying
the expected range labels begin at 5.80.1, end at 5.92.4, and are contiguous,
along with their per-range commit counts. Keep the existing row-count and
aggregate checks, and avoid relying only on totals that could remain unchanged
when ranges are omitted or replaced.

Source: Path instructions

@cv
cv merged commit 4298c03 into main Aug 11, 2026
71 of 73 checks passed
@cv
cv deleted the codex/post-tag-docs-audit-20260810-100048 branch August 11, 2026 01:05
@apurvvkumaria

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Readiness is blocked by the PR review workflow, not by this change.

The Nemotron advisory lane stopped twice with the same SDK tool-sequencing error while the other advisory lane completed and reported no findings. All other repository checks pass. The repository readiness checker therefore remains fail-closed because one advisory check is red and the published advisory result is incomplete.

I will leave the branch unmerged and monitor for a workflow recovery or a new branch revision that starts a fresh run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: docs Documentation, examples, guides, or docs build

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants