Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting #902

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wtoorop
Copy link
Member

@wtoorop wtoorop commented Jun 20, 2023

@wtoorop wtoorop changed the title Features/error reporting draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting Jun 20, 2023
@gthess gthess marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2025 06:06
@gthess gthess requested a review from wcawijngaards March 16, 2025 06:06
@gthess
Copy link
Member

gthess commented Mar 16, 2025

I believe this is now ready for review.
There are no limits for error reporting.
Reports will be generated for client inited queries that gave an error during the mesh state.
This is mostly the validator at the moment. When EDEs for RPZ are introduced (blocked, censored, etc) it needs to be revisited (probably by excluding those codes from the report).
LDNS_EDE_OTHER is excluded from the reports because the code does not make sense by itself.
LDNS_EDE_STALE_ANSWER is not interfering with the report (it is generated when responding with stale data, not the same code path).

@gthess gthess self-assigned this Mar 19, 2025
@gthess gthess added this to the Future release milestone Mar 19, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wcawijngaards wcawijngaards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks fine to include. The option set default off is a safe way to introduce the feature.

@gthess
Copy link
Member

gthess commented Mar 19, 2025

Thanks @wcawijngaards ! And nice catch!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants