Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2.2.1 #267

Merged
merged 64 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

v2.2.1 #267

merged 64 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

jcaracappa1
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcaracappa1 jcaracappa1 commented Sep 18, 2024

Summary

Consists of pull request #249 to #264

  • General calibration of several species biomass
  • Added spatial comparisons functionality for biomass and catch
  • Updated reference data from survdat and commercial landings
  • Added environmental thresholds functionality
  • Updated initial and forced spatial distributions
  • New calibration tools for effort-based fleets and density dependent movement

Important model changes

  • at_biology.prm -
  • at_run.prm - initial scalars
  • neus_init.nc - spatial distribution updates based on bottom trawl survey data for Groundfish species

andybeet and others added 30 commits March 4, 2024 17:00
…mmunities at sea species.

- moved argentines to FDF
- removed dupicate entries created by joins
- fixed functional group naming bug
Fixes to age structure (WHK, BLF, TAU, YTF) and reasonability (COD, SUF, LOB, HER)
add spatial reference points, example scripts
- added a new file to create and a new outputfile
spring and fall swept area biomass
RGamble1 and others added 20 commits August 26, 2024 12:37
Changed folder for data files
Merge branch 'andy_speciesupdate' into dev_branch

# Conflicts:
#	data-raw/create_survdat_biomass.r
#	data/sweptAreaBiomassNEUSBoxSpringandFall.RDS
Dev branch int NE_groundfish_spatial
add density dependent movement parameter functions
@jcaracappa1 jcaracappa1 changed the title Dev branch v2.2.1 Sep 18, 2024
@andybeet
Copy link
Member

@RGamble1 i dont see a problem with this. we ran the model on dev and all looked good

Copy link
Collaborator

@RGamble1 RGamble1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @andybeet @jcaracappa1

@andybeet andybeet merged commit d380760 into master Sep 18, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants