Skip to content

Conversation

secherka
Copy link
Contributor

Updating the notes to make it clear that #1, #2 and so on should not be added to Reply URI when configuring multi instancing.

Updating the notes to make it clear that MicrosoftDocs#1, #2 and so on should not be added to Reply URI when configuring multi instancing.
Copy link
Contributor

@secherka : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit f335bf2:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/identity/saas-apps/amazon-web-service-tutorial.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-regandowner
Copy link
Contributor

@nguhiu - Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants