Skip to content

Conversation

@abretonc7s
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changelog

CHANGELOG entry:

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

abretonc7s and others added 30 commits October 9, 2025 20:17
abretonc7s and others added 24 commits October 27, 2025 14:20
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

The purpose of this test is to increase predictions e2e coverage by
adding a cash out position test. Scenario 4 from Test Plan
## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.


<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> Adds an end-to-end cash-out flow test with comprehensive Polymarket
API/RPC/order-book mocks and new testIDs to enable stable UI automation.
> 
> - **E2E Tests**:
> - Add `predict-cash-out.spec.ts` covering cash-out flow (balances
update, activity entry, position removal) and related page objects.
> - Update `predict-api-down.spec.ts` to use new Polymarket mocks path.
> - **Mocks (Polymarket)**:
> - Introduce detailed mocks: event details (dynamic by `eventId`),
current/resolved positions (with optional winnings), order book per
`token_id`, activity, UpNL, and complete setup helpers.
> - Add post-action helpers: `POLYMARKET_POST_CASH_OUT_MOCKS`,
`POLYMARKET_FORCE_BALANCE_REFRESH_MOCKS`,
`POLYMARKET_REMOVE_CASHED_OUT_POSITION_MOCKS`, and post-claim mocks.
> - New constants for USDC balances (initial/post-claim/post-cash-out)
and addresses; track dynamic USDC balance in RPC mocks.
> - Remove legacy `polymarket-mocks.ts` and split into organized files.
> - **General Mocks**:
> - Expand price API defaults and add `polygon-rpc.com` default RPC
mock.
> - **Selectors & Pages**:
> - Add Predict Activity Details selectors and page; extend
ActivitiesView with predictions tab and helpers; refine predictions
selectors (stable position card IDs).
> - **App UI (testIDs)**:
> - Add `testID`s to `PredictActivityDetail` (back, title, amount,
container).
>   - Add `testID` to market details cash-out Button.
>   - Adjust position components’ `testID`s for stable selection.
> 
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
02b594f. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> Replace hardcoded fingerprint with `yarn fingerprint:generate` in
`.github/workflows/build-android-e2e.yml` to compute the cache key
dynamically.
> 
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
47f5d9a. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->

---------

Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <[email protected]>
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

This PR fixes a critical bug in the GitHub Actions workflow that was
preventing native code changes from triggering E2E test rebuilds.

**Problem:** The negation pattern `!scripts/build.sh` in the paths
filter was breaking the entire filtering logic, causing the
dorny/paths-filter action to incorrectly treat all files (including
native Android and iOS code) as ignored. This meant that PRs with only
native code changes would not trigger app rebuilds, potentially running
E2E tests against stale builds.

**Solution:**
1. Moved `scripts/build.sh` from the `ignore` section (with problematic
negation) to the `shared` section
2. Added comprehensive documentation explaining the intended filter
logic
3. Ensured native code changes (`android/**`, `ios/**`) properly trigger
platform-specific rebuilds

This fix ensures the CI workflow correctly identifies when rebuilds are
needed while maintaining the intended optimization of avoiding
unnecessary rebuilds for documentation-only changes.

## **Changelog**

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Create a test PR with only Android native code changes (e.g., modify
a file in `android/app/src/`)
2. Verify the `needs_e2e_build` job outputs `android_changed: true` and
`builds: true`
3. Create a test PR with only iOS native code changes (e.g., modify a
file in `ios/`)
4. Verify the `needs_e2e_build` job outputs `ios_changed: true` and
`builds: true`
5. Create a test PR with only documentation changes (e.g., modify
`README.md`)
6. Verify the `needs_e2e_build` job outputs `builds: false` (no
unnecessary rebuilds)
7. Create a test PR that modifies `scripts/build.sh`
8. Verify it triggers rebuilds for both platforms (`android_changed:
true`, `ios_changed: true`)

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

### **Before**

Native code changes were incorrectly flagged as ignored:

### **After**

Native code changes now properly trigger the appropriate platform
builds.

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.


<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> Refines path filters in `needs-e2e-build.yml` by moving
`scripts/build.sh` to `shared`, clarifying ignore rules, and adding
clear documentation to ensure correct Android/iOS rebuild triggers.
> 
> - **CI Workflow (`.github/workflows/needs-e2e-build.yml`)**:
>   - **Path filtering**:
> - Move `scripts/build.sh` from `ignore` to `shared` to trigger
rebuilds on changes.
> - Keep native paths `android/**` and `ios/**` as platform-specific
triggers; group common/dependency files under `shared`.
> - Maintain `ignore` for docs/workflow and utility scripts; refine
patterns and comments for clarity.
>     - Preserve `catch_all` fallback and output listing configuration.
> - **Documentation**: Add detailed comments explaining filter intent
and key points.
> 
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
ddc5d0b. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@abretonc7s abretonc7s closed this Oct 30, 2025
@abretonc7s abretonc7s deleted the feat/hip-3-fees branch October 30, 2025 13:12
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants