feat: add documentation about scope

[sileht]

This adds the monorepo section and talk about scopes

[mergify]

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 🤖 Continuous Integration

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

• all of:
  • check-success = build
  • check-success = lint
  • check-success = test
  • any of:
    • check-success = test-broken-links
    • label = ignore-broken-links
  • any of:
    • check-success=Cloudflare Pages
    • -head-repo-full-name~=^Mergifyio/

🟢 👀 Review Requirements

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

• any of:
  • #approved-reviews-by >= 2
  • author = dependabot[bot]
  • author = mergify-ci-bot

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

• title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?:

🟢 🔎 Reviews

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

• #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0
• #review-requested = 0
• #review-threads-unresolved = 0

🟢 📕 PR description

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

• body ~= .{48,}

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Adds a new documentation page detailing scope-based optimization for monorepos and links it in the Merge Queue navigation.

• Adds a "Monorepo Optimization" doc with configuration and CI examples
• Updates navigation to include the new page under Merge Queue

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 9 comments.

File	Description
src/content/navItems.tsx	Adds nav item linking to the new Monorepo Optimization docs page
src/content/docs/merge-queue/monorepo.mdx	Introduces comprehensive docs on scopes with YAML and GitHub Actions examples

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[jd]

It'd be nice with some schema too but maybe later.

Pull request has been modified.

Pull request has been modified.

[JulianMaurin]

That's nice 🙌

But I think the complexity related to the merge-queue scope can lead to confusion.
Maybe it's a dumb suggestion, but if it only applies to draft PRs, maybe we can set a name that reflects this better

Pull request has been modified.

[jd]

Missing entry in index pages too.

Pull request has been modified.