Fix typo.

_docs/L10N.md

@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ Akan<br />Bihari<br />Gun<br />Klingon (tlhIngan Hol,  )
 Amharic (አማርኛ)<br />Assamese (অসমীয়া)<br />Bangla/Bengali (বাংলা)<br />Dogri (𑠖𑠵𑠌𑠤𑠮)<br />Gujarati (ગુજરાતી)<br />Hindi (हिंदी)<br />Kannada (ಕನ್ನಡ)<br />Nigerian Pidgin<br />Persian/Farsi (فارسی)<br />Zulu (isiZulu) | `int2Type3` | `fraction2Type2`
 Arabic (<code dir="rtl">العربية</code>) *‡1* | `int6Type1` | `int1` | *‡1: CLDR's information suggests 6 distinct grammatical numbers used, but I haven't been able to successfully replicate this via online translators or dictionaries in most cases, so I'm not entirely sure about it.*
 Armenian (հայերեն)<br />Bhojpuri (भोजपुरी)<br />Brazilian Portuguese (Portugues do Brasil)<br />French (Français)<br />Fulah<br />Kabyle (ثاقبايليث) | `int2Type3` | `fraction2Type1`
-Bambara<br />Bhutanese/Dzongkha (རྫོང་ཁ)<br />Burmese (ျမန္​မာဘာသာ)<br />Chinese (中文) *‡1*<br />Hmong Njua<br />Igbo<br />Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia)<br />Japanese (日本語)<br />Javanese (Jawa)<br />Kabuverdianu<br />Khmer (ភាសាខ្មែរ)<br />Korean (한국어)<br />Koyraboro Senni<br />Lakota (Lakȟótiyapi)<br />Lao (ພາສາລາວ)<br />Lojban<br />Makonde<br />Malay (Bahasa Melayu)<br />N’Ko (ߒߞߏ)<br />Osage<br />Sakha<br />Sango<br />Sichuan Yi (ꆈꌠꉙ)<br />Thai (ไทย)<br />Tibetan (བོད་སྐད)<br />Toki Pona *[†1](http://tokipona.net/tp/janpije/originallessons-tp3.php)*<br />Tongan (Faka-Tonga)<br />Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt)<br />Wolof (Wollof)<br />Yoruba (Yorùbá) | `int1` | `int1` | Although `int1`+`int1` could *imply* that there aren't plural forms for a particular language, it should be noted that in most cases, plurality can be inferred by context, indicated by [specificity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specificity_(linguistics)), [reduplication](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplication), or otherwise determined by some other means. It doesn't mean that there aren't plurals. Rather, it simply means that for those languages, it doesn't mean anything for this particular class.<br /><br />*‡1: Whether simplified (傳統) or traditional (简体), Cantonese (广东话) or Mandarin (普通话), or whatever else, pluralisation rules are the same (AFAICT).*
+Bambara<br />Bhutanese/Dzongkha (རྫོང་ཁ)<br />Burmese (ျမန္မာဘာသာ)<br />Chinese (中文) *‡1*<br />Hmong Njua<br />Igbo<br />Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia)<br />Japanese (日本語)<br />Javanese (Jawa)<br />Kabuverdianu<br />Khmer (ភាសាខ្មែរ)<br />Korean (한국어)<br />Koyraboro Senni<br />Lakota (Lakȟótiyapi)<br />Lao (ພາສາລາວ)<br />Lojban<br />Makonde<br />Malay (Bahasa Melayu)<br />N’Ko (ߒߞߏ)<br />Osage<br />Sakha<br />Sango<br />Sichuan Yi (ꆈꌠꉙ)<br />Thai (ไทย)<br />Tibetan (བོད་སྐད)<br />Toki Pona *[†1](http://tokipona.net/tp/janpije/originallessons-tp3.php)*<br />Tongan (Faka-Tonga)<br />Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt)<br />Wolof (Wollof)<br />Yoruba (Yorùbá) | `int1` | `int1` | Although `int1`+`int1` could *imply* that there aren't plural forms for a particular language, it should be noted that in most cases, plurality can be inferred by context, indicated by [specificity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specificity_(linguistics)), [reduplication](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplication), or otherwise determined by some other means. It doesn't mean that there aren't plurals. Rather, it simply means that for those languages, it doesn't mean anything for this particular class.<br /><br />*‡1: Whether simplified (傳統) or traditional (简体), Cantonese (广东话) or Mandarin (普通话), or whatever else, pluralisation rules are the same (AFAICT).*
 Belarusian (Беларуская мова)<br />Bosnian (Bosanski)<br />Croatian (Hrvatski)<br />Russian (Русский)<br />Serbian (Српски)<br />Serbo-Croatian<br />Ukrainian (Українська) | `int3Type4` | `int1`
 Breton (Brezhoneg) | `int4Type3` | `int1`
 Colognian | `int3Type2` | `int1`
@@ -480,4 +480,4 @@ This means, that in theory, you could have an unlimited number of languages as f
 ---
 
 
-Last Updated: 13 May 2023 (2023.05.13).
+Last Updated: 19 September 2023 (2023.09.19).