forked from jspellman814/wordpress-composer-managed
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Redesigned "Spotlight" posts to use similar styling to new design system Alerts / SuggestionPanels #188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Redesigned "Spotlight" posts to use similar styling to new design system Alerts / SuggestionPanels #188
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2fa0c77
Add new spotlight flavor of alert. Updated colors and implmemented in…
djanelle-mit 2b6e9b1
Updated max width for images in spotlights
djanelle-mit 08bc801
Add ARIA label to button and tweak image size
djanelle-mit 2343827
Remove link around spotlight post titles
djanelle-mit eb495af
Update from aria-label to title attribute for button
djanelle-mit 8fb036f
Incremented the version for the parent theme styling
djanelle-mit bf679e2
Removed unused style rules for old spotlight feature
djanelle-mit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like refactoring this template to remove the classes
excerpt-post__figandexcerpt-post__bodywill orphan some styles in the stylesheet. It may also orphan the entireexcerpt-postclass, but that isn't as clear to me. It isn't entirely clean, as some rules are also applied to asection-hiliteclass (that seems to be already abandoned, or at least I don't see it referenced in any of our templates - maybe it's produced by WordPress itself somehow).Is it worth cleaning out references to these classes from the stylesheet (lines 722, 738-772, and 1375-1885) along with this change? Or would it be better to keep those in place just in case something references them from plugins or whatnot?
I do see a pair of templates from the news theme which still use
excerpt-postas a class name, but IIRC the news theme and child themes are siblings - neither of them inherits from the other.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@matt-bernhardt It looks like the
.excerpt-postand their respective__classes aren't used anywhere now. I tried removing thehiliterelated classes but it seems to affect the Image + Link pairings below the spotlight on the Scholarly page, so left those rules completely to avoid any effects downstream. Tagging you for re-review just to double-check this!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah... we're using those classes in hand-crafted HTML on a page like that. Huh... that's going to make the determination of whether a class is abandoned or not a little harder to determine. We might be able to search an exported database for instances of those class names, but IIRC WordPress keeps some prior versions of content around depending on the retention settings of each site, so even if we find content that uses those class values we'd need to dig deeper to see if we're finding current content or former versions of pages and articles.
There's probably a way to write a SQL query that will restrict only to current versions of site content, but I write the query off the top of my head.
In terms of this PR, this all looks fine to me now. Thanks for digging in on this.