Skip to content

Conversation

@Agastya18
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. Easy labels Nov 26, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Walkthrough

Two test server files have been removed from the server directory. server/simple-test.ts and server/test-minimal.ts previously contained minimal HTTP server implementations using Hono and @hono/node-server. The first ran on port 9000 with a simple GET route, while the second ran on port 8003 with test and health check endpoints. Both files, including their route definitions, server startup logic, and associated console outputs, have been deleted.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3b591d and ad1cb4f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • server/simple-test.ts (0 hunks)
  • server/test-minimal.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • server/simple-test.ts
  • server/test-minimal.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔍 Remote MCP Context7

Based on the context I've gathered, here's the relevant information for reviewing this pull request:

Summary of Additional Context

Framework & Technology Context

Hono is a small, simple, and ultrafast web framework built on Web Standards, working on any JavaScript runtime like Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun, and Node.js.

Why this matters for the PR review:

  • The two test files being deleted (simple-test.ts and test-minimal.ts) both used Hono as their HTTP framework with the @hono/node-server adapter
  • Hono is designed as a lightweight framework that works across multiple runtimes, including Node.js
  • The deleted files represented basic HTTP servers: one had a single GET /simple route and another had GET /test and GET /health routes
  • Both files used the same technology stack (Hono + @hono/node-server) and served similar purposes—lightweight test servers listening on different ports (9000 and 8003)

Review Considerations

  1. Redundancy: Both files appear to have similar purposes (test HTTP servers) with slightly different route structures
  2. Cleanup: The PR description states these are "unused" test servers—reviewers should verify they are indeed not referenced elsewhere in the codebase or CI/CD configurations
  3. Port Conflicts: The deleted servers used specific ports (9000 and 8003); confirm these ports aren't used elsewhere or that the removal doesn't impact any integration tests,
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: prettier-and-build

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@matteo8p matteo8p left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ship

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Nov 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Easy lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants