DebugPilot AI — AI-Powered Debugging Workflow#156
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughAdds a new DebugPilot AI kit: lamatic kit config and static flow, README/agent/constitution docs, a minimal Next.js app scaffold with env examples and package config, and a .gitignore for dev/build artifacts. ChangesDebugPilot AI Kit Initialization
Suggested reviewers
Act like the agent handler from Mission: Impossible — your mission, should you choose to accept it: review the kit setup and docs. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsGit: Failed to clone repository. Please run the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Hi maintainers This PR was submitted for the I don’t appear to have permission to add labels from my side, so requesting the Thank you! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Hello @Yashyr190 The structure is not right. Can you please check and update? Reference: https://github.com/Lamatic/AgentKit/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#repository-layout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/.gitignore`:
- Around line 1-4: The .gitignore currently lists .env.local but omits .env,
risking secret leaks; update the .gitignore by adding an entry for `.env`
(alongside the existing `.env.local`, node_modules, .next, dist) so both
environment files are ignored and secrets cannot be committed.
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/agent.md`:
- Line 14: The file ends without a trailing newline (MD047) at the end of the
line containing "Suggested engineering fixes"; open kits/debugpilot-ai/agent.md,
go to the final line with that text, and add exactly one newline character so
the file ends with a single trailing newline while not adding any extra blank
lines.
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/apps/package.json`:
- Around line 7-10: The dependency entries for react and react-dom use caret
ranges and must be pinned to exact versions; update the package.json
dependencies so the "react" and "react-dom" fields use exact version strings
(e.g., "18.2.0" without the ^) to satisfy the locked-version requirement and
ensure deterministic installs.
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/constitutions/default.md`:
- Line 7: Add a single trailing newline character at the end of the file so the
last line "Prefer deterministic debugging approaches" ends with a newline
(fixing MD047); open kits/debugpilot-ai/constitutions/default.md, move to the
end of the file and ensure there is one newline character after that final line.
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/README.md`:
- Around line 162-170: Add a blank line after each screenshot heading to satisfy
markdownlint MD022: insert an empty line between the "Landing Interface" heading
and its <img ...> tag, between the "Structured Debugging Report" heading and its
first <img ...> tag, and between the "Deployment Failure Analysis" heading and
its <img ...> tag so each heading is followed by a blank line before the image.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c4e2cd6f-5564-4611-8443-a16642aea684
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
kits/debugpilot-ai/.gitignorekits/debugpilot-ai/README.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/agent.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/apps/.env.examplekits/debugpilot-ai/apps/app/page.tsxkits/debugpilot-ai/apps/package.jsonkits/debugpilot-ai/apps/tsconfig.jsonkits/debugpilot-ai/constitutions/default.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.tskits/debugpilot-ai/lamatic.config.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/apps/package.json`:
- Around line 4-6: The package.json currently only defines the "dev" script;
update the "scripts" object to add production and quality commands by adding
"build" (run Next's production compile, e.g., "next build"), "start" (run the
compiled server, e.g., "next start"), and a "lint" script (run ESLint over the
repo, e.g., "next lint" or "eslint . --ext .js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx"); edit the same
"scripts" object where "dev" is defined so CI and deploys can invoke "npm run
build", "npm run start", and "npm run lint".
- Around line 7-11: The package.json currently lists only runtime deps under
"dependencies" but is missing TypeScript tooling required for building .tsx
files; add "typescript" and appropriate type packages (e.g., "@types/react",
"@types/react-dom", and "@types/node") to the project
dependencies/devDependencies in package.json so the TypeScript compiler and type
definitions are available for the tsconfig.json-based build and editor tooling;
update the "dependencies"/"devDependencies" section accordingly and run the
install to ensure tsc and the React/Node types are present.
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts`:
- Around line 1-9: The current getDebugPilotFlow() only returns metadata;
replace it with a Lamatic-style flow object containing top-level keys meta,
inputs, references, nodes, and edges to match execute-flow.ts structure; add a
trigger node named triggerNode of type graphqlNode, at least one processing node
(e.g., debugLLMNode or LLMNode) to perform analysis, create edges connecting
triggerNode -> debugLLMNode -> any output node, and populate references with
output mappings so the flow can export results to Studio; ensure the function
still exports the flow as getDebugPilotFlow.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 474e4ecb-5d27-4875-a36c-2e473e6192ca
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
kits/debugpilot-ai/.gitignorekits/debugpilot-ai/README.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/agent.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/apps/app/page.tsxkits/debugpilot-ai/apps/next.config.mjskits/debugpilot-ai/apps/package.jsonkits/debugpilot-ai/constitutions/default.mdkits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.tskits/debugpilot-ai/lamatic.config.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts (1)
4-8:⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical | 🏗️ Heavy liftMission-critical: this export is metadata-only, not a runnable flow definition.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it: replace this with a full Lamatic flow object (
meta,inputs,references,nodes,edges). In its current form, Line 4-8 cannot execute as an actual workflow and will block thedebugpilot-flowcontract.#!/bin/bash # Read-only verification: compare this flow shape with established kit flow files. # Expected result: this file should expose full flow keys; currently likely only id/name. set -euo pipefail echo "== Target flow ==" cat -n kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts echo echo "== Compare against existing flow implementations (if present) ==" fd -t f "flow.ts" kits | xargs -I{} sh -c 'echo "--- {} ---"; rg -n "meta|inputs|references|nodes|edges" "{}" || true'🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts` around lines 4 - 8, The current export getDebugPilotFlow returns only id/name metadata and must be replaced with a full Lamatic flow object: update the exported function getDebugPilotFlow to return an object containing meta, inputs, references, nodes, and edges (not just id/name) so it is a runnable flow; populate meta (id, name, description, version), define inputs schema expected by the debugpilot kit, add references for any external tools/services, and implement nodes and edges representing the flow graph (use existing flow implementations as a template for node/edge shapes and naming conventions) so the debugpilot-flow contract can execute.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Duplicate comments:
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts`:
- Around line 4-8: The current export getDebugPilotFlow returns only id/name
metadata and must be replaced with a full Lamatic flow object: update the
exported function getDebugPilotFlow to return an object containing meta, inputs,
references, nodes, and edges (not just id/name) so it is a runnable flow;
populate meta (id, name, description, version), define inputs schema expected by
the debugpilot kit, add references for any external tools/services, and
implement nodes and edges representing the flow graph (use existing flow
implementations as a template for node/edge shapes and naming conventions) so
the debugpilot-flow contract can execute.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9e4ed1eb-2928-47ef-ad23-388625277a3d
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
kits/debugpilot-ai/apps/package.jsonkits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@EXDEV-oss |
|
Really appreciate that |
|
That’s honestly a really interesting perspective. |
|
That honestly sounds interesting. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts`:
- Around line 21-23: The flow's references.output is pointing to a non-existent
nodeId "debug-analysis", breaking extraction; update the references.output value
to "debugLLMNode" (the existing LLM node at line 34) so the runtime extracts
from that node, or alternatively add a new node with nodeId "debug-analysis"
that aggregates the output of "debugLLMNode" and wire it via edges; locate the
references object (references.output) and either change the string to
"debugLLMNode" or create a node entry with nodeId "debug-analysis" plus an edge
from "debugLLMNode" to it.
- Around line 37-39: The debugLLMNode's values object is underspecified—update
the values for debugLLMNode to include explicit LLM configuration: add a model
field (e.g., "gpt-4" or "claude-3-sonnet"), a temperature (suggest 0.3–0.5), a
maxTokens integer to bound output, and either a systemPrompt or an expanded
structured prompt that sets debugging behavior and constraints; ensure these
keys are added to the same values object currently containing prompt so the node
no longer relies on platform defaults.
- Line 5: Add an explicit TypeScript return type to getDebugPilotFlow by
defining a reusable type (e.g. LamaticFlowConfig) that matches the flow shape
(meta, inputs, references, nodes, edges) and then annotate the function as
export function getDebugPilotFlow(): LamaticFlowConfig; update any internal
object literals to conform to that type signature so the function returns a
value of LamaticFlowConfig (use the suggested type fields: meta, inputs,
references, nodes, edges and the node/edge shape) to restore type safety and IDE
support.
- Around line 26-32: The graphql trigger node "triggerNode" in
debugpilot-flow.ts currently has empty values, so populate its values to match
other GraphQL triggers: set fields like responseType (e.g., "realtime" or
"single"), advance_schema (the GraphQL input schema/object describing request
fields), and any widget or trigger metadata required by the runtime (e.g.,
title, description, inputNames). Update the node object with these properties
(nodeId: "triggerNode", nodeType: "graphqlNode") so the runtime/Studio exposes
the proper request fields; if Studio is intended to overwrite this, add a short
comment in the values explaining the overwrite contract instead.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 81c5e866-74f5-4891-9ade-a53a2edacd64
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kits/debugpilot-ai/flows/debugpilot-flow.ts
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Hi @Yashyr190! 👋 Before this PR can be reviewed by maintainers, please resolve all comments and requested changes from the CodeRabbit automated review. Steps to follow:
This helps keep the review process efficient for everyone. Thank you! 🙏 |
|
Resolved the latest CodeRabbit review feedback and pushed the required updates. Current changes include:
All current checks are passing successfully for the latest commit. Ready for maintainer re-review. Thank you! |
2 participants
DebugPilot AI — AI-Powered Debugging Assistant
Contribution Type
Overview
DebugPilot AI is an AI-powered debugging assistant designed to help developers analyze runtime errors, deployment failures, API issues, and stack traces through structured engineering-focused workflows.
The kit provides:
Repository Structure Validation
kits/debugpilot-ai/lamatic.config.tsREADME.mdagent.mdflows/constitutions/default.mdapps/App Structure
The kit includes a minimal Next.js application scaffold with:
apps/package.jsonapps/app/page.tsxapps/.env.exampleapps/next.config.mjsapps/tsconfig.jsonFlow Configuration
The kit defines:
debugpilot-flowDEBUGPILOT_FLOW_IDLocal Validation
npm installcompletes successfullynpm run devstarts locallyNotes
This submission focuses on establishing the foundational kit structure, workflow configuration, and debugging-oriented AI experience aligned with AgentKit contribution guidelines.
debugpilot-flowwith env bindingDEBUGPILOT_FLOW_ID.errorerrorfield and serves as entry triggerdebugLLMNode) — configured with model/generation params and a fixed analysis prompt to produce debugging outputerrorstring via a GraphQL trigger, forwards it to an LLM node that runs a fixed analysis prompt to produce a structured debugging analysis; scaffold intended for later expansion.debugpilot-aiwith scripts (dev/build/start/lint) and pinned deps (next@14.2.5, react@18.2.0, react-dom@18.2.0) and TypeScript dev deps.Overall note: flow uses two node types (graphqlNode trigger and llmNode analysis) wired in a simple trigger→LLM pattern; the codebase changes are primarily a foundational scaffold (app scaffold, flow config, docs, and kit metadata).