Skip to content

Conversation

@daniCsorbaJB
Copy link

Main branch for documentation rewrite efforts.
Related ticket: KT-66330

Main branch for documentation rewrite efforts
<instance-profile id="serialization" name="Serialization" start-page="serialization.md">
<snippet id="serialization">
<toc-element topic="serialization.md" toc-title="Introduction"/>
<toc-element toc-title="Get started">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these elements are not directly related to the content of this PR; are you sure you will be able to keep them in sync during other PR's review process?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shouldn't be a problem, it's just required for the WS preview/at the end for the library. At this point, it just serves as a skeleton, but we can modify it as we go with other PRs as needed.

…2978)

* update: first update for serialization documentation restructuring

* implementing review comments

* setting up temporary folder for review

* implementing review comments

* fix: typo

* implementing TWr review comments

* implementing last TWr review comments

* implementing last minor updates before the merge
* feat: adding the get started page

* implementing review comments from first round of review

* implementing second round of comments for the get started page

* fix: using slightly smoother wording for R8

* update: clarifying Bazel support and addressing last comment about R8

* update: implementing TWr comments from Sarah

* update: refining R8 related comments slightly

* adding final version for whats next link
* feat: adding the serialize built in types page

* update: implementing first round of review comments

* update: implementing second review round comments

* update: moving tip and removing objects

* fix: capitalization of Kotlin serialization for consistency

* update: implementing comments from Sarah for TWr review

* update: adding ids to the runnable examples
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants