Skip to content

fix(ci): fetch full history for Gitleaks range scan - #157

Open
KooshaPari wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/security-scan-history-20260828
Open

fix(ci): fetch full history for Gitleaks range scan#157
KooshaPari wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/security-scan-history-20260828

Conversation

@KooshaPari

@KooshaPari KooshaPari commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

User description

Root cause

Gitleaks receives a changed-range expression containing head^, but the Security Scan checkout used the default shallow history. On PR #151 this produced an ambiguous revision and a partial zero-byte scan.

Change

Set fetch-depth: 0 only for the Security Scan checkout. This preserves Gitleaks changed-range scanning and makes the parent commit available; it does not weaken or skip scanning.

Verification

  • Demonstrated the pre-change security block lacked full-history checkout.
  • Candidate YAML parses successfully.
  • Candidate introduces no new actionlint findings beyond existing workflow findings.
  • Verified the pushed remote branch contains the full-history checkout contract.

Scope

One workflow file; no secrets, permissions, scanner configuration, or unrelated CI behavior changed.


CodeAnt-AI Description

Ensure security scans can review the full pull request history

What Changed

  • Security scans now check out the complete repository history, including the parent commit needed for changed-range analysis
  • Gitleaks can scan pull request changes reliably instead of receiving an incomplete or ambiguous commit range

Impact

✅ Reliable pull request secret scanning
✅ Complete changed-range analysis
✅ Fewer false or empty security scan results

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 28, 2026 07:00
@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status

Status Commit Started (UTC) Finished (UTC)
✅ Reviewed your PR 543bbc9 Aug 28, 2026 · 07:00 07:00

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Self-merge is blocked due to missing requirements:

  • ❌ Not all quality gates have passed
  • ❌ PR does not have required review approval

Please ensure all checks pass before merging.

@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files label Aug 28, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Compliance Check ✅

All constitution compliance checks passed!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Report

✅ Unit Tests: PASSED
✅ E2E Tests: PASSED
⏭️ Integration Tests: SKIPPED (no integration directory)
✅ FR Annotations: VALID

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Self-merge is blocked due to missing requirements:

  • ❌ Not all quality gates have passed
  • ❌ PR does not have required review approval

Please ensure all checks pass before merging.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Compliance Check ✅

All constitution compliance checks passed!

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Report

✅ Unit Tests: PASSED
✅ E2E Tests: PASSED
⏭️ Integration Tests: SKIPPED (no integration directory)
✅ FR Annotations: VALID

@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (1 file)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml - Added fetch-depth: 0 to Security Scan checkout to enable Gitleaks changed-range analysis; fixed trailing newline

Reviewed by free · Input: 39.4K · Output: 4.6K · Cached: 127.1K

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants