Skip to content

Capture settings opening failure events - #13892

Draft
JordanNoone wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/settings-dialog-native-linux
Draft

JordanNoone wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/settings-dialog-native-linux

Conversation

@JordanNoone

@JordanNoone JordanNoone commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Record delivered pointer/click events, URL and file state, focus changes, and dialog mount/removal when the user-reset test cannot open Settings. Print the capture in the failing attempt's log and attach it while preserving the original five-second assertion and error.

This improves evidence for #13843; it does not fix the flake. Local browser controls distinguish a prevented click from a transient dialog and preserve both expected assertion failures. The reset test passed on its first native Ubuntu attempt (8.9s) at 122b92675daffcb46930a3d940f1088d3aef0d74 in shard 8; two other tests in that shard needed retries. Full CI is blocked by 21 terminal Engine service/connection failures across the three Rust shards.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
modeling-app Ready Ready Preview Sep 15, 2026 7:05am UTC

Request Review

@JordanNoone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Final TAB diagnosis for this head:

  • GitHub's TAB status says 12069 of 12090 passing, 20 new failures.
  • The authenticated current-results view has exactly one final failing result: kcl_test_import_obj_with_mtl, matching the terminal cargo shard 2 failure already tracked in OBJ material import snapshot repeatedly falls below image similarity threshold #13900.
  • The other 19 are stale retry attempts counted before TAB's deferred finalization pass; the same status/UI race is tracked in KittyCAD/test-analysis-bot#449 with draft fix KittyCAD/test-analysis-bot#450.

No additional rerun was started. The remaining real failure stays owned by #13900.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant