Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ordering by ID #12323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024
Merged

Fix ordering by ID #12323

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Dec 21, 2024

Follow-up to #12320

I tried to interpret "(Sorted alphabetically by Id)".

Mandatory checks

  • I own the copyright of the code submitted and I licence it under the MIT license
  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if change is visible to the user)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

@koppor koppor requested a review from calixtus December 21, 2024 14:09
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 21, 2024

The build for this PR is no longer available. Please visit https://builds.jabref.org/main/ for the latest build.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr merged commit a7d7bd9 into main Dec 21, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the fix-alphabetic-ordering branch December 21, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants